CO Molecular Gas in Infrared-luminous Galaxies

By Lihong Yao, E. Seaquist, N. Kuno, L. Dunne. 2003

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the first statistical survey of the properties of the 12CO(1-0) and 12CO(3-2) line emission from the nuclei of a nearly complete subsample of 60 infrared (IR) luminous galaxies selected from SCUBA Local Universe Galaxy Survey (SLUGS). This subsample is flux limited at S60 μm ≥ 5.24 Jy with far-IR (FIR) luminosities mostly at LFIR > 1010 L☉. We compare the emission line strengths of 12CO(1-0) and (3-2) transitions at a common resolution of ~15''. The measured 12CO(3-2) to (1-0) line intensity ratios r31 vary from 0.22 to 1.72, with a mean value of 0.66 for the sources observed, indicating a large spread of the degree of excitation of CO in the sample. These CO data, together with a wide range of data at different wavelengths obtained from the literature, allow us to study the relationship between the CO excitation conditions and the physical properties of gas/dust and star formation in the central regions of galaxies. Our analysis shows that there is a nonlinear relation between CO and FIR luminosities, such that their ratio LCO/LFIR decreases linearly with increasing LFIR. This behavior was found to be consistent with the Schmidt law relating star formation rate to molecular gas content, with an index N = 1.4 ± 0.3. We also find a possible dependence of the degree of CO gas excitation on the efficiency of star-forming activity. Using the large velocity gradient (LVG) approximation to model the observed data, we investigate the CO-to-H2 conversion factor X for the SLUGS sample. The results show that the mean value of X for the SLUGS sample is lower by a factor of 10 compared to the conventional value derived for the Galaxy, if we assume the abundance of CO relative to H2, ZCO = 10-4. For a subset of 12 galaxies with H I maps, we derive a mean total face-on surface density of H2 + H of about 42 M☉ pc-2 within about 2 kpc of the nucleus. This value is intermediate between that in galaxies like our own and those with strong star formation.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eee14d1a1037c698b82ac98e20f940d5455a5718

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. D. Narayanan
  4. Mark R. Krumholz
  5. F. Walter
  6. R. Somerville
  7. A. Dekel
  8. R. Dav'e

Citations in the corpus