Quantitative tools for perfecting species lists

By M. Palmer, Peter G. Earls, Bruce Hoagland, Peter White, Thomas Wohlgemuth. 2002

428 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee998f0c132ead4d0ecf35b356f07d50621c613d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Duccio Rocchini
2. Carmela Francesca Izzi
3. Giles M. Foody
4. Harini Nagendra
5. Carlo Ricotta
6. Kate S. He
7. Jens Oldeland
8. Markus Neteler

In Ecology

1. Duccio Rocchini
2. Thomas W. Gillespie
3. Giles M. Foody
4. Harini Nagendra
5. Carlo Ricotta
6. Kate S. He
7. Jens Oldeland
8. Markus Neteler

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Duccio Rocchini
2. Giovanni Bacaro
3. Carmela Francesca Izzi
4. Giles M. Foody
5. Harini Nagendra
6. Carlo Ricotta
7. Kate S. He
8. Jens Oldeland

Citations in the corpus

• Are there habitats that contribute best to plant species diversity in coastal dunes? (2009, positive): “…each sample plot according to the formula (1): R ¼ P j IjkðN FjÞ=N Sk ð1Þ where Ijk is the incidence of species j in plot k, Fj is total number of plots containing species j, N is the total number of plots and Sk is the number of species in the plot k (Palmer et al. 2002; Chiarucci et al. 2007).”
• Accounting for uncertainty when mapping species distributions: The need for maps of ignorance (2011, neutral): “…Araújo and Guisan, 2006; Heikkinen et al., 2006; Hortal and Lobo, 2006; Hortal et al., 2007, 2008; Jiménez-Valverde et al., 2008b; Kadmon et al., 2003, 2004; Lobo, 2008b; Lobo et al., 2007; Loiselle et al., 2003, 2008; Luoto et al., 2005; Palmer, 1995; Palmer et al., 2002; Pearson et al., 2006).”
• Are landscapes as crisp as we may think (2007, result): “This is in good agreement with the concept of ‘ecological continuum’ (Palmer et al., 2002) that relates observed spatial patterns to gradually varying ecological processes (Foody, 1996a,b).”
• Remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity as a proxy of species diversity: Recent advances and open challenges (2010, methodology): “Given the difficulties associated with field-based data collection, the use of remote sensing for estimating environmental heterogeneity and hence species diversity is a powerful tool since it provides a synoptic view of an areawith a high temporal resolution (Loarie et al., 2007).”
• Quantifying plant species diversity in a Natura 2000 network: Old ideas and new proposals (2008, background): “At these scales, floristic data are often collected subjectively and the lists of species may be adequate for some aims (e.g. description of local habitats) but not for quantitative ones (Palmer et al., 2002).”