Are landscapes as crisp as we may think

64 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity as a proxy of species diversity: Recent advances and open challenges (2010, background): “Nonetheless, a number of problems arise when trying to create abrupt thresholds (boundaries) for identifying explicit spatial units such as patches (Foody, 2002, 2008b), leading some researchers to ask explicitly if a landscape can actually be viewed as crisp, with abrupt boundaries (Southworth et a”
Accounting for uncertainty when mapping species distributions: The need for maps of ignorance (2011, background): “…by its intrinsic population dynamics, environmental adaptations and/or dispersal capacity, as well as by landscape and environmental complexity (Chust et al., 2003; Holt et al., 2005; Nagendra, 2001; Ricotta and Anand, 2006; Rocchini and Ricotta, 2007; Soberón, 2007, 2010; Whittaker et al., 2001).”
Measuring and modelling biodiversity from space (2008, background): “These allow the study of environmental gradients and transition zones and subpixel land cover (Foody, 1996; Rocchini and Ricotta, 2007).”