Involuntary Attention and Distractibility as Evaluated with Event-Related Brain Potentials

By Carles Escera, Kimmo Alho, Erich Schröger, István Winkler. Audiology and Neurotology, 2000

694 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee936c7ae0e800e8eff57a1deb850870a01579d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Role of Mismatch Negativity and Novelty-P3 in Involuntary Auditory Attention (2007, background): “, the subtraction of the responses elicited to standard trials from those elicited to the distracting ones, isolates the neuroelectric activation underlying behavioral distraction; for convenience, Escera and Corral (2003) termed this activation pattern the distraction potential (DP).”
Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study (2004, background): “Alternatively (or additionally), it might reflect response inhibition (Barcelo et al., 2002; Bruin et al., 2001; Courchesne et al., 1975; Escera et al., 2000; Friedman et al., 2001; Squires et al., 1975).”
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. (2007, result): “This suggestion is supported by numerous studies (Schröger, 1996a,b; Alho et al., 1997; Escera et al., 1998, 2000a, 2001, 2003; Schröger and Wolff, 1998a,b; Wolff and Schröger, 2001a,b; Schröger et al., 2000; Berti and Schröger, 2001; Roeber et al., 2003a,b; Berti et al., 2004; Shestakova et…”
The Frontal Generator of the Mismatch Negativity Revisited (2007, background): “Since the involvement of the auditory cortex is well established (Alho, 1995; Escera et al., 2000) the goal of this review was to revisit the supporting evidence for the involvement of the frontal lobe in the MMN generation.”
Violation of Expectation: Neural Correlates Reflect Bases of Prediction (2008, neutral): “…of equivalently organized trials and required participants to attend during the stimulus presentation in order to be able to detect the potential deviant (for discussion about preattentional deviance detection, cf. Na¨a¨ta¨nen, Jacobsen, & Winkler, 2005; Escera, Alho, Schro¨ger, & Winkler, 2000).”
The Role of Harmonic Expectancy Violations in Musical Emotions: Evidence from Subjective, Physiological, and Neural Responses (2006, background): “We assume that the earlier positivity reflects attentional mechanisms (such as an involuntary shift of attention due to the potential relevance of a perceived stimulus; Escera, Alho, & Schroger, 2000 ).”
Differential Contribution of Frontal and Temporal Cortices to Auditory Change Detection: fMRI and ERP Results (2002, background): “These differential distracting effects support the notion of two separate mechanisms of involuntary attention (Escera et al., 1998, 2000).”
Prediction, Cognition and the Brain (2009, background): “For example, errors of prediction which are irrelevant for the current mental set or refl ect noise in the environment can be registered and ignored, allowing the individual to reorient himself to the task at hand (Escera et al., 2000; Corbetta et al., 2002).”