Pharmacovigilance from social media: mining adverse drug reaction mentions using sequence labeling with word embedding cluster features

By Azadeh Nikfarjam, Abeed Sarker, Karen O'Connor, Rachel E. Ginn, Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez. J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc., 2015

565 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Objective Social media is becoming increasingly popular as a platform for sharing personal health-related information. This information can be utilized for public health monitoring tasks, particularly for pharmacovigilance, via the use of natural language processing (NLP) techniques. However, the language in social media is highly informal, and user-expressed medical concepts are often nontechnical, descriptive, and challenging to extract. There has been limited progress in addressing these challenges, and thus far, advanced machine learning-based NLP techniques have been underutilized. Our objective is to design a machine learning-based approach to extract mentions of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from highly informal text in social media. Methods We introduce ADRMine, a machine learning-based concept extraction system that uses conditional random fields (CRFs). ADRMine utilizes a variety of features, including a novel feature for modeling words’ semantic similarities. The similarities are modeled by clustering words based on unsupervised, pretrained word representation vectors (embeddings) generated from unlabeled user posts in social media using a deep learning technique. Results ADRMine outperforms several strong baseline systems in the ADR extraction task by achieving an F-measure of 0.82. Feature analysis demonstrates that the proposed word cluster features significantly improve extraction performance. Conclusion It is possible to extract complex medical concepts, with relatively high performance, from informal, user-generated content. Our approach is particularly scalable, suitable for social media mining, as it relies on large volumes of unlabeled data, thus diminishing the need for large, annotated training data sets.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Toxicology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee8085bd00f437318cce5b919b47233de8c5f6ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Zhiyong Lu
  2. Chih-Hsuan Wei
  3. Yifan Peng
  4. Sarah Wiegreffe
  5. Roei Schuster
  6. Koustuv Saha
  7. Karen O'Connor
  8. Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez

In Molecular Biology

  1. Zhiyong Lu
  2. Chih-Hsuan Wei
  3. Yifan Peng
  4. Vitaly Shmatikov
  5. Sarah Wiegreffe
  6. Abeed Sarker
  7. Robert Leaman
  8. Rezarta Islamaj Dogan

In Toxicology

  1. Karen O'Connor
  2. Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez
  3. Azadeh Nikfarjam
  4. Rachel E. Ginn
  5. Abeed Sarker

Citations in the corpus