Improving chemical disease relation extraction with rich features and weakly labeled data

By Yifan Peng, Chih-Hsuan Wei, Zhiyong Lu. 2016

81 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundDue to the importance of identifying relations between chemicals and diseases for new drug discovery and improving chemical safety, there has been a growing interest in developing automatic relation extraction systems for capturing these relations from the rich and rapid-growing biomedical literature. In this work we aim to build on current advances in named entity recognition and a recent BioCreative effort to further improve the state of the art in biomedical relation extraction, in particular for the chemical-induced disease (CID) relations.ResultsWe propose a rich-feature approach with Support Vector Machine to aid in the extraction of CIDs from PubMed articles. Our feature vector includes novel statistical features, linguistic knowledge, and domain resources. We also incorporate the output of a rule-based system as features, thus combining the advantages of rule- and machine learning-based systems. Furthermore, we augment our approach with automatically generated labeled text from an existing knowledge base to improve performance without additional cost for corpus construction. To evaluate our system, we perform experiments on the human-annotated BioCreative V benchmarking dataset and compare with previous results. When trained using only BioCreative V training and development sets, our system achieves an F-score of 57.51 %, which already compares favorably to previous methods. Our system performance was further improved to 61.01 % in F-score when augmented with additional automatically generated weakly labeled data.ConclusionsOur text-mining approach demonstrates state-of-the-art performance in disease-chemical relation extraction. More importantly, this work exemplifies the use of (freely available) curated document-level annotations in existing biomedical databases, which are largely overlooked in text-mining system development.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Andrew McCallum
  2. Pat Verga
  3. Trapit Bansal
  4. Nathan Greenberg
  5. Guodong Zhou
  6. Longhua Qian
  7. Fuqing Sun
  8. Jinghang Gu

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Andrew McCallum
  2. Zhiyong Lu
  3. Trapit Bansal

In Molecular Biology

  1. Andrew McCallum
  2. Pat Verga
  3. Trapit Bansal
  4. Nathan Greenberg
  5. Guodong Zhou
  6. Fuqing Sun
  7. Jinghang Gu
  8. Longhua Qian

Citations in the corpus