Perpetrator or Victim? Relationships Between Intimate Partner Violence and Well-Being

By Kristin L. Anderson. 2002

347 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee73dfd2129c8cab586308ac269649eb459f0b41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Health

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Mental Health Factors and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration and Victimization: A Meta-Analysis (2017, background): “Anderson, K. L. (2002). Perpetrator or victim? Relationships between intimate partner violence and well-being.”
CUSTODY DISPUTES INVOLVING ALLEGATIONS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: TOWARD A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO PARENTING PLANS (2008, background): “Preoccupation with the demands of their abuser (ACV), a conflict-ridden marriage (CIV), or a traumatic separation (SIV) may render parents physically and emotionally exhausted, inconsistently available, overly dependent upon, or unable to protect their children from the abuser (Anderson, 2002; Liebe”
A Developmental Process Analysis of the Contribution of Childhood Emotional Abuse to Relationship Violence (2010, background): “In support of this assertion, Anderson (2002) found that victimization actually mediated the relation between risk factors and perpetration.”
Examining Symmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Adults Using Socio-Demographic Characteristics (2010, methodology): “In addition, if the consequences of mutual or common couple violence are not equal it is difficult for claims of symmetry to be upheld (Anderson 2002).”
Patterns of Violent Relationships, Psychological Distress, and Marital Satisfaction in a National Sample of Men and Women (2005, background): “In a recent study of victimization and perpetration, Anderson (2002) found that when both women and their partners displayed violent behaviors, women experienced more psychological problems following their victimization than men who were victimized.”
A literature review of intimate partner violence and its classifications (2016, background): “…also acknowledges that violence can be perpetrated by men as well as women without restriction to marital, heterosexual, or homosexual relationships (Anderson, 2002; Archer, 2000, 2002; Brown, 2004; Capaldi, Kim, & Shortt, 2007; Capaldi & Owen, 2001; Hamberger & Potente1994; Straus & Gelles, 1986).”
Female Violence Against Intimate Partners: An Introduction (2005, background): “For example, in a recent analysis of a nationally representative sample, Anderson (2002) found that 10% of all couples reported some type of mutual violence in the last year. Looking at the patterns of violence in more detail, it was noted that, in 7% of the couples, both were violent. For 2% of the”
Marital Satisfaction and Marital Discord as Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence: A Meta-analytic Review (2008, neutral): “Previous research suggested that women in violent relationships experience more psychological distress than do men in violent relationships (Anderson 2002; Swan and Snow 2003).”
Precursors and Correlates of Women's Violence: Child Abuse Traumatization, Victimization of Women, Avoidance Coping, and Psychological Symptoms (2005, background): “Another example of the investigation of both using violence and being victimized in the same analysis is the study of the relationships among women’s use of violence, their experiences of being victimized, and depression (Anderson, 2002).”
Gender differences in intimate partner violence outcomes. (2012, methodology): “Anderson (2002), examining a large nationally representative sample of heterosexual couples, found that in couples in which both partners are physically aggressive, the effects are more detrimental in terms of depressive symptoms for women than men.”
Rates of Bidirectional Versus Unidirectional Intimate Partner Violence Across Samples, Sexual Orientations, and Race/Ethnicities: A Comprehensive Review (2012, methodology): “Two separate studies also relied on data from the National Survey of Families and Households; again, only the study with the most recent data and largest sample was retained (Anderson, 2002), as Umberson, Anderson, Glick, and Shapiro (1998) was excluded.”
Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations (2008, neutral): “There are many other studies showing bidirectionality (Anderson, 2002; Capaldi & Owen, 2001; McCarroll, Ursano, Fan, & Newby, 2004; Moffitt, Caspi, Rutter, & Silva, 2001; Whitaker, Haileyesus, Swahn, & Saltzman, 2007; Williams & Frieze, 2005).”