Patterns of Violent Relationships, Psychological Distress, and Marital Satisfaction in a National Sample of Men and Women
By Stacey L. Williams, Irene Hanson Frieze. 2005
195 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Health, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62ccf1900dccb422d9b386e42174026195586ae7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- D. Dutton
- Murray A. Straus
- Jennifer E. Caldwell
- V. D. Woodbrown
- F. Buttell
- Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
- A. Ford
- Michelle Carney
In Health
- Murray A. Straus
- Michelle Carney
- D. Dutton
- Tiffany A. Misra
- Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
- Jennifer E. Caldwell
- V. D. Woodbrown
- F. Buttell
In Sociology and Political Science
- Tiffany A. Misra
- Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
- Jennifer E. Caldwell
- V. D. Woodbrown
- Murray A. Straus
- A. Ford
- Michelle Carney
- Maureen C McHugh
Citations in the corpus
- Gender symmetry in partner violence: Evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. (2009, unknown): “…among married couples (K. L. Anderson, 2002; Capaldi & Owen, 2001; Gelles & Straus, 1988; Kessler, Molnar, Feurer, & Appelbaum, 2001; McCarroll, Ursano, Fan, & Newby, 2004; Medeiros & Straus, 2007; Moffitt, Caspi, Rutter, & Silva, 2001; Straus, Gelles, & Steinmetz, 2006; Williams & Frieze, 2005).”
- The Impact and Consequences of Partner Abuse on Partners (2012, background): “…victims also experience a greater impact to their well-being and their relationship satisfaction than do male victims, and associations between physical IPV and self-reported poor health and morbidity are significant for women but not for men (e.g., Sundaram et al., 2004; Williams & Frieze, 2005).”
- A Postmodern Approach to Women's Use of Violence: Developing Multiple and Complex Conceptualizations (2005, methodology): “In this issue, Williams and Frieze (2005a) address questions of how to define and label stalking and also address the students’ question of how such behaviors are related to their physical safety.”
- Marital Satisfaction and Marital Discord as Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence: A Meta-analytic Review (2008, unknown): “M Comm. Delsol et al. (2003) −0.01 153 MS Stand.”
- Rates of Bidirectional Versus Unidirectional Intimate Partner Violence Across Samples, Sexual Orientations, and Race/Ethnicities: A Comprehensive Review (2012, methodology): “Two separate studies were also produced from data gathered from the National Comorbidity Survey; the most recent and inclusive study was chosen for retention (Williams & Frieze, 2005); Kessler, Molnar, Feurer, and Appelbaum (2001) was excluded.”
- Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations (2008, result): “There are many other studies showing bidirectionality (Anderson, 2002; Capaldi & Owen, 2001; McCarroll, Ursano, Fan, & Newby, 2004; Moffitt, Caspi, Rutter, & Silva, 2001; Whitaker, Haileyesus, Swahn, & Saltzman, 2007; Williams & Frieze, 2005).”
- Gender differences in intimate partner violence outcomes. (2012, methodology): “For example, as discussed earlier, women in the general population are twice as likely to suffer from depression and most anxiety disorders, and 2.5 times more likely to have PTSD, compared to men (National Comorbidity Survey, 2011; Nolen-Hoeksema, 2001).”
- Women who perpetrate intimate partner violence: A review of the literature with recommendations for treatment (2007, background): “Recently, Williams and Frieze (2005) analyzed the National Comorbidity Survey data.”