Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers

By J. Adams. 2002

329 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee6164a88e416afe4e2af781b8dd3f9901e5e4ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

The Causal Impact of Education on Economic Growth: Evidence from U.S. (2009, background): “Our paper is also related to studies of how universities affect innovation in the geographic area immediate around them: Adams (2002); Andersson, Quigley, and Wilhelmsson (2004); Anselin, Varga, and Acs (1997); Fischer, Mafred, and Varga (2003); Florax (1992); Jaffe (1989); and Varga (1998).”
Exploiting States’ Mistakes to Identify the Causal Impact of Higher Education on Growth (2005, background): “Taking the ratio of (1) to (2) and equating it with the ratio of (6) to (7), we immediately obtain the following result:”
Urbanization, productivity, and innovation: Evidence from investment in higher education (2009, unknown): “This latter finding is consistent with results reported by Adams (2002) for US academic institutions.”
Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms (2004, background): “Adams (2001) survey of 208 private R&D laboratories in the United States finds that distance is a greater barrier to sourcing knowledge from public science than from firms.”
Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999 (2005, background): “For more, see Adams and Jaffe (1996) and Adams (2002). with other top 110 schools.”
The Economic Development Impacts of Universities on Regions: Do Size and Distance Matter? (2006, background): “By examining a survey of research and development laboratories in the United States, Adams (2002) finds that knowledge spillovers originating from universities are more geographically localized than those from industrial research efforts, a result seconded by Beugelsdijk and Cornet (2002) for the Ne”
Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence (2015, background): “12 This result is consistent with an earlier finding by Adams (2002), who reports for US data that university spillovers to private R&D are more localised than industrial spillovers to private R&D.”
Assessing the Regional Economic Development Impacts of Universities: A Review of Current Approaches (2007, background): “Although the focus is mainly on fouryear research universities in the United States, relevant work pertaining to Canadian and European research universities and occasionally to other types of knowledge-generating institutions is included as well.”
Spreading the Word: Geography, Policy and University Knowledge Diffusion (2010, background): “Evidence in Adams (2002) suggests that university spillovers are more localized than corporate-generated spillovers, but a full examination of this interesting question is left for future research.”
Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation (2005, background): “Jaffe and Trajtenberg (2002, chapters 8, 9), Adams (2002), and Jozefowicz (2002) compare knowledge flows originating in universities, federal labs, and firms, and Maruseth and Verspagen (2002) analyzes knowledge flows across European regions.”
The governance and performance of universities: Evidence from Europe and the US (2010, background): “This paper shares instruments and some data with Aghion et al. (2005), but the focus is entirely different.”