Innovation and Climate Policy
By David Popp. 2010
247 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee4a33e958823af3fe124b1feb3ab73ef656fc6e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Environmental Engineering
- Felix Creutzig
- Antoine Dechezleprêtre
- C. Fischer
- Sam Fankhauser
- Eugénie Joltreau
- Gregory F. Nemet
- S. Pontoglio
- René Kemp
Citations in the corpus
- The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? (2011, background): “It is being observed that eco-innovation suffers from two market failures — the public good nature of knowledge and non-internalisation of externalities (Jaffe et al., 2002b; Newell, 2010; Popp, 2010; Rennings, 2000), calling for policies of push and pull, raising questions about the proper balance ”
- Exuberance in China's renewable energy investment: Rationality, capital structure and implications with firm level evidence (2016, background): “Private sources are more likely to invest in firms with imminent profitability (Popp, 2010).”
- Environmental Macroeconomics: Environmental Policy, Business Cycles, and Directed Technical Change (2013, background): “…theoretical work establishes how optimal policy responds when technological innovation is endogenous, and empirical studies establish the responsiveness of innovation measures to environmental policies (see, e.g. Popp 2004, Gillingham et al. 2008, Fischer and Newell 2008, Popp 2010, Adao et. al.”
- Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market (2012, background): “…often with innovation measured at the level of economic sectors or countries (Jaffe & Palmer, 1997; Newell, Jaffe, & Stavins, 1999; Brunnermeier & Cohen, 2003; Popp, 2002; Aghion et al., 2012; and many others; see Popp, Newell, & Jaffe, 2010, Popp, 2010, and Ambec et al., 2013, for recent surveys).”
- The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? (2010, unknown): “…patent applications, Lanjouw and Mody (1996), Brunnermeier and Cohen (2003), Popp (2003, 2006), Arimura, Hibiki, and Johnstone (2007), Johnstone, Hascic, and Popp (2010), Lanoie et al. (2011), and Lee, Veloso, and Hounshell (2011) all find a positive relationship with environmental regulation.”
- The role of patent protection in (clean/green) technology transfer (2010, background): “15 Wright and Shih (2010) provide an example of how a significant strengthening of IPRs in agricultural biotechnology in the US during the 1980s has led to an increase in private investment in applied research, but has had a negative impact on basic public research.”
- Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling (2018, background): “The promise of innovation is that it can make efforts to address climate change more effective and more affordable (Popp 2010).”
- Economic growth and development with low‐carbon energy (2017, background): “Supporting clean-tech innovation requires a combination of environmental policies (addressing environmental externalities) and R&D policies (addressing innovation-related market failures) along the full “innovation chain” from research to development, demonstration and deployment (Grubb 2014; Popp 2”
- Mobilizing private finance for low-carbon innovation – A systematic review of barriers and solutions (2017, unknown): “Environmental economists widely suggest a combination of regulation and R &D support as components of the solution [48,51,74,99].”