Neuroimaging of cognitive load in instructional multimedia

By Robert R. Whelan. 2007

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee0bd3a350b0d8f4401c3746d0ce7202cd1f7829

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Fred Paas
2. J. V. van Merriënboer
3. Kate M. Xu
4. John Sweller
5. Alexander Skulmowski
6. Slava Kalyuga
7. Tamara van Gog
8. Anthony R. Artino Jr.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Fred Paas
2. John Sweller
3. J. V. van Merriënboer
4. Tamara van Gog
5. Kate M. Xu
6. Alexander Skulmowski
7. Paul A. Kirschner
8. Slava Kalyuga

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Fred Paas
2. J. V. van Merriënboer
3. John Sweller
4. Tamara van Gog
5. Slava Kalyuga
6. Kate M. Xu
7. Alexander Skulmowski
8. Paul A. Kirschner

Citations in the corpus

• Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019, methodology): “Whereas several researchers have proposed to use neuroimaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI; e.g. Whelan 2007), a technique that has actually been used in cognitive load research is electroencephalography (EEG; Antonenko and Niederhauser 2010; Antonenko et al.…”
• Understanding Cognitive Load in Digital and Online Learning: a New Perspective on Extraneous Cognitive Load (2021, background): “He concludes that intrinsic load can be regarded as “ maintenance and manipulation demands placed on the prefrontal cortex ” (Whelan, 2007, p. 7).”