The School Counselor Activity Rating Scale: An Instrument for Gathering Process Data

By Janna L. Scarborough. 2005

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee05493806149b25e3de7592e5a619abab053602

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Gerta Bardhoshi
2. Daniel Gutierrez
3. Patrick R. Mullen
4. Amy Schweinle
5. Kelly Duncan

Citations in the corpus

• Council for accreditation of counseling and related educational programs: Preparation and performance match (2015, unknown): “Originally developed by Scarborough (2005), SCARS sought to measure both the frequency of actual and preferred performance (how they actually spend their time versus how they prefer to spend their time) of specific activities commonly performed by school counselors within the four major…”
• Understanding the Impact of School Factors on School Counselor Burnout: A Mixed-Methods Study (2014, methodology): “The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between burnout among professional school counselors, as measured by the Counselor Burnout Inventory (CBI; Lee et al., 2007), and the assignment of noncounseling duties, as measured by the School Counselor Activity Rating Scale (SCARS; Scarbo”
• Burnout, Stress, and Direct Student Services Among School Counselors (2016, methodology): “This study used the (a) Counselor Burnout Inventory (CBI; Lee et al., 2007), (b) the School Counselor Activity Rating Scale (SCARS; Scarborough, 2005), and (c) the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983).”
• Using Leader-Member Exchange Theory to Examine Principal-School Counselor Relationships, School Counselors' Roles, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intentions (2009, unknown): “Although a scale, the School Counselor Activity Rating Scale (SCARS; Scarborough, 2005), exists to measure such a discrepancy, the need to align data with the ASCA National Model and the desire for a more concise measure warranted developing a new instrument.”