Fingerprint Liveness Detection Using Curvelet Energy and Co-Occurrence Signatures
By Shankar Bhausaheb Nikam, Suneeta Agarwal. 2008
62 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Safety Research, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- Arun A. Ross
- Emanuela Marasco
- James M. Ferryman
- Peter Wild
- Lulu Chen
- Petru Radu
- Fabio Roli
- Luca Ghiani
In Safety Research
- James M. Ferryman
- Peter Wild
- Lulu Chen
- Petru Radu
- Emanuela Marasco
- Arun A. Ross
- Fabio Roli
- Luca Ghiani
In Signal Processing
- Emanuela Marasco
- Fabio Roli
- Arun A. Ross
- James M. Ferryman
- Peter Wild
- Lulu Chen
- Petru Radu
- Gian Luca Marcialis
Citations in the corpus
- Robust multimodal face and fingerprint fusion in the presence of spoofing attacks (2016, methodology): “The fi rst category assessing textural properties is the more widespread group with approaches like LBP [24], or statistical features [25] exploiting the observation that images/videos with spoofed faces (printed or replayed) do not exhibit the same noise-level like genuine samples.”
- Fingerprint liveness detection by local phase quantization (2012, background): “Several approaches have been proposed so far, but none of them have shown to reach an very low error rate [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7].”
- A Survey on Anti-Spoofing Schemes for Fingerprint Recognition Systems (2014, methodology): “First, the gray value of the center pixel of the circularly symmetric neighbor set is subtracted from the gray values of the circularly symmetric neighborhood [Nikam and Agarwal 2008b] [Martins et al. 2012].”