Effects of Intravenous Fluid Restriction on Postoperative Complications: Comparison of Two Perioperative Fluid Regimens: A Randomized Assessor-Blinded Multicenter Trial

By B. Brandstrup, H. Tønnesen, R. Beier-Holgersen, E. Hjortsø, H. Ørding, K. Lindorff-Larsen, M. Rasmussen, C. Lanng, L. Wallin, L. Iversen and 12 more. Annals of Surgery, 2003

1,098 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Objective: To investigate the effect of a restricted intravenous fluid regimen versus a standard regimen on complications after colorectal resection. Summary Background Data: Current fluid administration in major surgery causes a weight increase of 3–6 kg. Complications after colorectal surgery are reported in up to 68% of patients. Associations between postoperative weight gain and poor survival as well as fluid overload and complications have been shown. Methods: We did a randomized observer-blinded multicenter trial. After informed consent was obtained, 172 patients were allocated to either a restricted or a standard intraoperative and postoperative intravenous fluid regimen. The restricted regimen aimed at maintaining preoperative body weight; the standard regimen resembled everyday practice. The primary outcome measures were complications; the secondary measures were death and adverse effects. Results: The restricted intravenous fluid regimen significantly reduced postoperative complications both by intention-to-treat (33% versus 51%, P = 0.013) and per-protocol (30% versus 56%, P = 0.003) analyses. The numbers of both cardiopulmonary (7% versus 24%, P = 0.007) and tissue-healing complications (16% versus 31%, P = 0.04) were significantly reduced. No patients died in the restricted group compared with 4 deaths in the standard group (0% versus 4.7%, P = 0.12). No harmful adverse effects were observed. Conclusion: The restricted perioperative intravenous fluid regimen aiming at unchanged body weight reduces complications after elective colorectal resection.

Subfields: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/edfbcad4799c0d4d15c41e4291e625d77a9bd478

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

  1. Henrik Kehlet

In Surgery

  1. O. Ljungqvist
  2. K. Fearon
  3. M. Soop
  4. J. Nygren
  5. J. Hausel
  6. Henrik Kehlet
  7. S. Bischoff

Citations in the corpus