Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness

By Misun Hur, Jack L. Nasar, Bumseok Chun. 2010

317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Nature as a Moderator of Stress in Urban Children (2012, methodology): “The nature that people perceive has been used in previous studies as an indicator of the amount of nature existing in a place (Hur, Nasar & Chun, 2010).”
How does neighborhood design affect life satisfaction? Evidence from Twin Cities (2016, background): “In the area of residential satisfaction, Hur et al. (2010) explore the influences of building density and vegetation rate on neighborhood satisfaction through their influences on perceptions and evaluations although they do not explicitly tie their model to any theoretical framework.”
Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? (2011, unknown): “A good example of the former is a study carried out by Hur, Nasar, and Chun (2010) who used GIS measures and satellite images to estimate several basic physical parameters of an area (building density, vegetation rate, etc.), and later studied their relationship to the overall residence…”
Rethinking how built environments influence subjective well-being: a new conceptual framework (2018, background): “In particular, the majority of studies quantitatively assess the impact of neighborhood characteristics on neighborhood satisfaction (Buys and Miller 2012; Howley, Scott, and Redmond 2009; Hur and Morrow-Jones 2008; Hur, Nasar, and Chun 2010; Lovejoy, Handy, and Mokhtarian 2010; Yang 2008).”