Zooplankton on the move: first results on the quantification of dispersal of zooplankton in a set of interconnected ponds

By E. Michels, Karl Cottenie, L. Neys, L. De Meester. Hydrobiologia, 2004

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eda974fd500c488e8b10021dbc92adf45ceab483

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Any way the wind blows ‐ frequent wind dispersal drives species sorting in ephemeral aquatic communities (2008, background): “Zooplankton are known to disperse readily between aquatic systems that have either permanent (Cladocera; Michels et al. 2001) or temporary connections (large branchiopods; Hulsmans et al. 2006).”
The role of metacommunity processes in shaping invertebrate rock pool communities along a dispersal gradient (2007, background): “Connecting waterways between lenthic systems can act as important dispersal pathways; illustrated by Michels et al. (2001) for zooplankton and by Van de Meutter et al. (2006) for macroinvertebrates.”
Unintentional dispersal of aquatic invertebrates via footwear and motor vehicles in a Mediterranean wetland area (2010, background): “…more ‘natural’, vectors for aquatic invertebrates have already been put forward, including wind (Vanschoenwinkel et al., 2008a), water connections (Michels et al., 2001; Hulsmans et al., 2007), waterfowl (Green and Figuerola, 2005), amphibians (Bohonak and Whiteman, 1999), aquatic insects (Van…”
Connectivity and cladoceran species richness in a metacommunity of shallow lakes (2003, methodology): “Relatively high dispersal rates of on average 70 (Daphnia sp.) to 900 (Chydoridae) individuals per hour were observed, which corresponds to an influx of on average 0.1% of the local population size per day (Michels et al., 2001b).”
ZOOPLANKTON METACOMMUNITY STRUCTURE: REGIONAL VS. LOCAL PROCESSES IN HIGHLY INTERCONNECTED PONDS (2003, methodology): “This is an interesting perspective, given that dispersal rates are so high in the pond system (Michels et al. 2001b).”
The Monopolization Hypothesis and the dispersal–gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms (2002, background): “Michels et al. (2001) quantified dispersal of zooplankton through overflows among a set of neighbouring ponds, and observed dispersal rates of >10,000 zooplankton individuals per hour in some of the overflows.”
Dispersal of freshwater invertebrates by large terrestrial mammals: a case study with wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Mediterranean wetlands (2008, background): “Hydrochoric dispersal typically requires permanent or temporary connections (Michels et al., 2001; Hulsmans et al., 2007), while aerial dispersal by wind is relatively inefficient (Jenkins & Underwood, 1998; Vanschoenwinkel et al.”
Relative importance of different dispersal vectors for small aquatic invertebrates in a rock pool metacommunity (2008, background): “Although hydrochoric dispersal via permanent water connections can be very efficient (Havel et al. 2000, Michels et al. 2001a), overflowing water and associated propagules also do not always end up in other water bodies.”
METACOMMUNITY STRUCTURE: SYNERGY OF BIOTIC INTERACTIONS AS SELECTIVE AGENTS AND DISPERSAL AS FUEL (2004, methodology): “A mean of 3600 zooplankton individuals/h disperse through overflows and rivulets between any two connected ponds in this system, which corresponds to a population turnover time of 13 d (Michels et al. 2001b).”
Egg banks in freshwater zooplankton: evolutionary and ecological archives in the sediment (2004, background): “have been made (Brendonck & Riddoch, 1999; Bohonak & Whiteman, 1999; Michels et al., 2001).”
Zooplankton community structure and environmental conditions in a set of interconnected ponds (2004, methodology): “Morphometric variables of the lake were measured in the field (depth) or using the GIS environment of IDRISI (Version 2.0; Clark lab, 1997) after digitising maps of the different ponds (area [module AREA] and perimeter [module PERIM]; Michels et al., 2001 ).”