Air pressure and cosmogenic isotope production

By J. Stone. 2000

2,300 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eda66985466dac06ea756d7a5e0336f95c8c81de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. G. Balco
2. N. Lifton
3. Marek Zreda
4. Darin Desilets
5. Pieter Vermeesch
6. Brian Borchers
7. S. Marrero
8. J. Gosse

In Global and Planetary Change

1. G. Balco
2. Pieter Vermeesch
3. N. Lifton
4. F. Phillips
5. J. Gosse
6. Brian Borchers
7. S. Marrero
8. A. Hidy

Citations in the corpus

• Spatial and temporal distribution of secondary cosmic-ray nucleon intensities and applications to in situ cosmogenic dating (2003, background): “The problem of determining RC from geographic position and magnetic ¢eld intensity is discussed later in this paper, whereas the dependence of mass shielding depth on elevation has been discussed by [5,6].”
• Cosmogenic nuclide chronology of millennial-scale glacial advances during O-isotope stage 2 in Patagonia (2004, methodology): “It is important to scale global production rates (e.g., Stone, 2000) to an effective geo-magnetic latitude (Nishiizumi et al., 1989; Lal, 1991) to account for changes in the magnetic field over the exposure history of the sample.”
• A geologically constrained Monte Carlo approach to modeling exposure ages from profiles of cosmogenic nuclides: An example from Lees Ferry, Arizona (2010, methodology): “recalibrated according to Nishiizumi et al. [2007]) is set as the default 10 Be reference production rate at sea level and high latitude, which is scaled to the sample site using the Lal [1991] modified by Stone [2000] scaling scheme—a scheme based solely on measured latitude and atmospheric press”
• CosmoCalc: An Excel add‐in for cosmogenic nuclide calculations (2007, methodology): “The modified equation (26) can be rewritten as [Stone, 2000]:”
• The CREp program and the ICE-D production rate calibration database: A fully parameterizable and updated online tool to compute cosmic-ray exposure ages (2017, methodology): “They were computed using the scaling scheme Lal/Stone time dependent (Balco et al., 2008; Lal, 1991; Stone, 2000), with the ERA-40 atmosphere model (Uppala et al., 2005), the geomagnetic record of Lifton 2016 VDM (Laj et al., 2004; Lifton, 2016; Pav on-Carrasco et al., 2014; Ziegler et al., 2011)…”
• Production rate calculations for cosmic-ray-muon-produced 10Be and 26Al benchmarked against geological calibration data (2017, methodology): “Here I use the Antarctic 405 pressure-elevation relationship of Stone (2000) to estimate this from the site elevation 406 (2183 m elevation implies 741.8 hPa).”
• Scaling in situ cosmogenic nuclide production rates using analytical approximations to atmospheric cosmic-ray fluxes (2014, background): “, Antarctica and Iceland) are characterized by long-term deviations from this model (Licciardi et al., 2006; Stone, 2000).”
• Geological calibration of spallation production rates in the CRONUS-Earth project (2016, methodology): “We use a version of this scaling78 framework described in Stone (2000) that has been updated to use atmo-79 spheric pressure rather than elevation.”