Scaling in situ cosmogenic nuclide production rates using analytical approximations to atmospheric cosmic-ray fluxes

By N. Lifton, Tatsuhiko Sato, T. Dunai. 2014

765 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dea7cc25440d674c81e11abbffa19ec7739c3e8c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. G. Balco
2. N. Lifton
3. Marek Zreda
4. U. Arizona

In Molecular Biology

1. G. Balco
2. N. Lifton
3. Marek Zreda

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

1. G. Balco
2. Marek Zreda
3. N. Lifton

Citations in the corpus

• Footprint characteristics revised for field‐scale soil moisture monitoring with cosmic‐ray neutrons (2015, background): “By choosing a parameterized energy spectrum of this kind, Lifton et al. [2014] recently resolved some long lasting discrepancies among scaling models for cosmogenic nuclide production.”
• The CREp program and the ICE-D production rate calibration database: A fully parameterizable and updated online tool to compute cosmic-ray exposure ages (2017, methodology): “The CREp program uses the Lifton et al. (2014) implementation of this atmospheric dataset, at a spatial resolution of 125 km.”
• Production rate calculations for cosmic-ray-muon-produced 10Be and 26Al benchmarked against geological calibration data (2017, methodology): “Some 418 recent work (Lifton et al., 2014, J. Stone, written communications) has suggested that 419 the Heisinger method could be simplified without loss of accuracy by assuming α = 1, 420 that is, a linear energy dependence for σ.”