How Much Can Spatial Training Improve STEM Achievement?
By Mike Stieff, David H. Uttal. 2015
236 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Geography, Planning and Development
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed74469a1400a6359eb806e647f002995660ca40
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
- Mary Hegarty
- Nora S. Newcombe
- Tracy Logan
- Thomas Lowrie
- Richard E. Mayer
- Daphne Bavelier
- C. Shawn Green
- Alan Kingstone
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Nora S. Newcombe
- Thomas Lowrie
- Tracy Logan
- C. Shawn Green
- Richard E. Mayer
- Mary Hegarty
- Daphne Bavelier
- Adam Gazzaley
In Geography, Planning and Development
Citations in the corpus
- The Influence of Spatial Visualization Training on Students’ Spatial Reasoning and Mathematics Performance (2019, background): “Stieff and Uttal (2015) argued that to provide evidence for such transfer, a study must demonstrate that spatial training improves spatial skills and that the resulting improvement in spatial reasoning leads to improvements in STEM outcomes.”
- Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement (2019, background): “These correlational relations have in turn then sparked interest in the potential for cognitive training to produce enhanced performance in the various academic areas (Rohde and Thompson 2007; Stieff and Uttal 2015; Wright et al. 2008).”
- A Heuristic Framework of Spatial Ability: a Review and Synthesis of Spatial Factor Literature to Support its Translation into STEM Education (2018, unknown): “However, research studies categorically illustrating a causal effect remain outstanding (Ramey and Uttal 2017; Stieff and Uttal 2015), and therefore it is not scientifically known how or why these interventions are achieving the results they are.”