Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement

By C. Shawn Green, Daphne Bavelier, Arthur F. Kramer, S. Vinogradov, U. Ansorge, Karlene K. Ball, U. Bingel, Jason M. Chein, Lorenza S. Colzato, J. Edwards and 38 more. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2019

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ccd077836ffe863c8fa63027c8f64462de84a0cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. C. Smid
2. Nikolaus Steinbeis
3. J. Karbach
4. A. Diamond

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. C. Smid
2. Nikolaus Steinbeis
3. J. Karbach

Citations in the corpus

• Toward a Science of Effective Cognitive Training (2020, methodology): “Despite several recent best-practices recommendations (Green et  al., 2019; Simons et al., 2016) for evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive training, a comprehensive understanding of how, for whom, and why certain training can be effective is still missing.”