Criteria for qualitative research in psychology

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reconceptualizing the Member Check Interview (2013, background): “Validity There have been numerous attempts to create, modify, and synthesize criteria for validity in qualitative research (e.g., Creswell & Miller, 2000; Hammersley & Atkinson, 1995; Lather, 1995; Lincoln & Guba, 1985; Parker, 2004; Stiles, 1993; Whitmore, Chase, & Mandle, 2001).”
Recommendations for Designing and Reviewing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Promoting Methodological Integrity (2017, background): “In the discipline of psychology, qualitative research refers to methodical scientific practices aimed at producing knowledge about the nature of experience and/or action, including social processes (e.g., Fine, 2013; Morrow, 2005; Parker, 2004; Wertz et al., 2011).”
Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies (2017, background): “, 2015) and the key is for the guidelines to be used flexibly in ways that align with the research questions and approach (Patton, 1990; Santiago-Delefosse et al., 2016), by people who have a good understanding of qualitative research (Hannes et al.”
Lacanian Discourse Analysis in Psychology (2005, background): “Attending to deadlocks of perspective would be a Lacanian way of doing that, and the space this would open for application of ‘criteria’ in qualitative research in psychology would then be more constructively permissive than prohibitive (Parker, 2004).”