Threatened to distraction Mind-wandering as a consequence of stereotype threat

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The science of mind wandering: empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. (2015, background): “…wandering has also been associated with higher levels of depression (Deng et al. 2012), increases in mind wandering following stereotype threat (Mrazek et al. 2011), greater disruptions of everyday tasks (McVay et al. 2009), and increases in the risk of an accident while driving a car (Cowley…”
Practice Is Protective: Mindfulness Training Promotes Cognitive Resilience in High-Stress Cohorts (2017, background): “Furthermore, negative mood (Smallwood et al. 2009), dysphoria (Murphy et al. 2013), stereotyped threat (Mrazek et al. 2011), sleep deprivation (Chua et al. 2014), and craving (Sayette et al. 2010) promote attentional performance lapses and correspond with greater self-reported mind wandering.”
Negative Stereotypes Cause Christians to Underperform in and Disidentify With Science (2015, methodology): “We sought to collect data from approximately 200 participants in Study 1 (which tested stereotype content) and 30 participants per cell in Studies 3–4 (which tested effects of stereotypes on Christians’ performance; equivalent sample sizes were obtained in similar studies: DarNimrod & Heine, 2006; M”
Mindfulness Training Improves Working Memory Capacity and GRE Performance While Reducing Mind Wandering (2013, methodology): “Detailed descriptions of these methodologies are available in prior work (Mrazek et al., 2011; Schooler et al., 2011).”