From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do the Institutional Settings and the Source of Funds of R&D Matter?

523 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Knowledge Spillovers from Clean and Dirty Technologies (2014, methodology): “First, as explained above, the average number of citations received and made has been rising over time (Hall et al. (2001)).”
Do tax incentives for research increase firm innovation? An RD design for R&D (2016, unknown): “39 See Hall and Ziedonis (2001), Arora, Ceccagnoli, and Cohen (2008), Gurmu and Pérez-Sebastián (2008), Dernis et al.”
Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: testing the knowledge production function using international data (2008, background): “In the model of Howitt (2000) TFP growth is positively related to (X/Q)(Amax - A)/Amax, while TFP growth is positively related to both (X/Q) (Amax - A)/Amax and (Лтах - Л)/Лтах in the Schumpeterian models of Griffith et al.”
R&D spending in the high-tech sector and economic growth (2007, background): “…R&D expenditures are generally considered as one of the most important factors in explaining the growth of output or total factor productivity (see Bassanini et al. (2001), Coe and Helpman (1995); Guellec and Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie (2004), Khan and Lunitel (2006) and Nadiri (1993)).”