Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital

By Nick Bontis. 2001

1,833 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ecb313cf8969447a26b5f2f6ff57f0cad53757a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

1. Nick Bontis
2. Ruzita Jusoh
3. Kaveh Asiaei
4. John Dumay
5. R. Whiting
6. Jan Mouritsen
7. Neha Smriti
8. N. Das

Citations in the corpus

• The relevance of knowledge management and intellectual capital Research (2008, background): “Currently, KM/IC is in its embryonic stages of development but it grows at an accelerated rate (Bontis, 1999, 2001; Serenko and Bontis, 2004).”
• Intellectual capital disclosure payback (2011, background): “…that focuses on the valuation and reporting of intangible assets such as intellectual capital (IC) (Cañibano et al., 2000; Guthrie and Petty, 2000; Bontis, 2001; Brennan, 2001; Pike et al., 2002; April and Bosma, 2003; Bontis, 2003; Bozzolan, 2003; Kaufmann and Schneider, 2004; Ittner and…”
• Intellectual capital and performance measurement systems in Iran (2018, background): “documents, databases, process descriptions, plans) and the intellectual properties of the firm (Khalique et al., 2015; Bontis, 2001; Edvinsson and Malone, 1997; Stewart, 1997).”
• Intellectual capital and financial performance: an evaluation of the Australian financial sector (2013, background): “IC has been referred to as intangible assets, intangibles or knowledge assets (Bontis, 2001; Kujansivu, 2005).”
• Impact of intellectual capital on organisational performance: An empirical study of companies in the Hang Seng Index (Part 1) (2009, background): “It may be a broad term that is also seen by some as being synonymous with intangible assets, invisible assets, knowledge assets, knowledge capital, information assets, human capital and the hidden value of companies, to name just a few ( Bontis, 2001”
• Intangible assets and firm heterogeneity: Evidence from Italy (2014, background): “It represents the collection of skills and abilities t hat are embedded in the members of the organization (Bontis and Fitz-enz, 2002) and ca n be leveraged to expand intangible resources at the firm level. In this sen se, therefore, the more a firm is endowed with a highly educated workforce, the m”
• Intellectual capital and firm performance: the mediating role of innovation speed and quality (2018, background): “Some studies develop a single construct of IC ( Bontis, 2001; Edvinsson & Malonene, 1997; ), while others identify various sub-constructs or dimensions of the concept, such as human capital, structural capital, and relational capital (Menor, Kristal, & Rosenzweigig, 2007; Wang, Wang, & Liangng,…”
• On the metaphorical nature of intellectual capital: a textual analysis (2005, result): “This latter view also seems to be more in line with the idea promoted by many authors (Roos et al., 1997; Edvinsson and Malone, 1997; Bontis, 2001) that IC is more than knowledge.”
• Assessment of Intellectual Capital Management in Taiwanese IC Design Companies: Using DEA and the Malmquist Productivity Index (2006, neutral): “Many studies have conferred upon the importance and content of intellectual capital (Edvinsson and Malone, 1997; Stewart, 1997; Sullivan, 2000; Bontis, 2001).”