How the brain tissue shapes the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation
By Alexander Opitz, Mirko Windhoff, R. Heidemann, Robert Turner, Axel Thielscher. NeuroImage, 2011
340 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec90c01c3c9b5745d0c80fb0ce30d2db59d92220
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Neurology
- Til Ole Bergmann
- Axel Thielscher
- Gesa Hartwigsen
- Guilherme B. Saturnino
- Andre Antunes
- Hartwig Roman Siebner
- Mirko Windhoff
- Alexander Opitz
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Axel Thielscher
- Til Ole Bergmann
- Guilherme B. Saturnino
- Hartwig Roman Siebner
- Gesa Hartwigsen
- Mirko Windhoff
- Alexander Opitz
- Andre Antunes
Citations in the corpus
- Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: An optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models (2013, methodology): “A detailed analysis of the results are beyond the scope of this work (please refer to Opitz et al., 2011).”
- Combining non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation with neuroimaging and electrophysiology: Current approaches and future perspectives (2016, positive): “However, while TMS induces the effective electric current directly in the brain tissue bypassing scalp and skull (Opitz et al., 2011), TCS has to pass the current through these structures, rendering them crucial for the current distribution in the brain (Opitz et al.”
- Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? (2015, background): “Based on the observation that the electric field strength reaches a peak at gyral crowns and the directly underlying white matter, it was suggested that these positions are the most likely stimulated parts [3, 12].”
- Electric field depth–focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs (2012, positive): “Anatomically realistic TMS models [120,121] can be particularly useful in studying the effect of the complex tissue structure of the head on the electric field for various coil placements.”
- Cognitive state dependent enhancement of cognitive control with transcranial magnetic stimulation (2026, unknown): “An additional consideration is that we did not perform electric field modelling, which provides estimates of TMS-induced current distribution 85,86 .”