Kirkpatrick Model: Its Limitations as Used in Higher Education Evaluation

By Michael Bobias Cahapay. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2021

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

One of the widely known evaluation models adapted to education is the Kirkpatrick model. However, this model has limitations when used by evaluators especially in the complex environment of higher education. Addressing the scarcity of a collective effort on discussing these limitations, this review paper aims to present a descriptive analysis of the limitations of the Kirkpatrick evaluation model in the higher education field. Three themes of limitations were found out: propensity towards the use of the lower levels of the model; rigidity wich leaves out other essential aspects of the evaluand; and paucity of evidence on the causal chains among the levels. It is suggested that, when employing the Kirkpatrick model in higher education, evaluators should address these limitations by considering more appropriate methods, integrating contextual inputs in the evaluation framework, and establishing causal relationships among the levels. These suggestions to address the limitations of the model are discussed at the end of the study.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Emergency Medical Services, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec70140f68510610837c2da96ae78aac09aeccca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Aljawharah Alsalamah
2. Carol Callinan

In Emergency Medical Services

1. Aljawharah Alsalamah
2. Carol Callinan

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Aljawharah Alsalamah
2. Carol Callinan

Citations in the corpus

• Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers (2021, methodology): “Many authors have adapted Kirkpatrick’s model for use in academic contexts by determining metrics and assessments geared to specific learning environments, which shows the potential of its use in this area [17,48].”