The Convergent Validity of Four Burnout Measures in a Chinese Sample: A Confirmatory Factor‐Analytic Approach

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Is Burnout a Depressive Condition? A 14-Sample Meta-Analytic and Bifactor Analytic Study (2021, methodology): “The first analysis involved the largest full-MBI sample (Sample 1; Finland); the second analysis, the largest full-MBI-GS sample (Sample 4; Sweden); and the third analysis, the largest fullSMBM sample (Sample 9; Switzerland).”
JOB BURNOUT: A GENERAL LITERATURE REVIEW (2020, methodology): “, 2004) in an example of 696 manufacturing managers using the Japanese language version of the MBI-GS, and by (Qiao and Schaufeli, 2010), also by (Schutte and Schaufeli, 2000; Shirom and Melamed, 2006).”
The Job Demands-Resources Model: An Analysis of Additive and Joint Effects of Demands and Resources. (2011, methodology): “Burnout was assessed with the exhaustion and cynicism subscales of the Chinese version (Hu & Schaufeli, 2011) of the Maslach Burnout Inventory—General Survey (MBI-GS; Schaufeli, Leiter, Maslach, & Jackson, 1996).”
Burnout: Moving beyond the status quo. (2017, background): “Although there is evidence of the convergent validity of the burnout construct (Halbesleben & Demerouti, 2005; Qiao & Schaufeli, 2011; Winwood & Winefield, 2004), the discriminant validity of the burnout construct has been found to be unsatisfactory, most notably with respect to depression.”