Schema design and implementation of the grasp-related mirror neuron system

By Erhan Öztop, Michael A. Arbib. Biological cybernetics, 2002

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec2375953cf5bf458aa7d1d565878153b1923571

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The functional significance of mu rhythms: translating "seeing" and "hearing" into "doing". (2005, background): “These data suggest that the prefrontal mirror neuron system may in fact be part of a broader network, one responsible for biological motion perception [36,99].”
On the Shared Control of an EMG-Controlled Prosthetic Hand: Analysis of User–Prosthesis Interaction (2008, background): “The natural hand reaches, preshapes, and grasps the object, according to affordances provided by internal models after visual perception [41].”
Physiologically Inspired Model for the Visual Recognition of Transitive Hand Actions (2013, positive): “…computational models for goal-directed action recognition have focused on the role of motor representations (Haruno et al., 2001; Wolpert et al., 2003) and specifically of the mirror neuron system (Oztop and Arbib, 2002; Demiris and Simmons, 2006; Oztop et al., 2006; Kilner et al., 2007).”
Imitation Learning (2017, methodology): “Imitation learning research done in this direction focuses on object manipulation, such as sorting and assembly tasks [Saunders et al. 2006; Pook and Ballard 1993; Oztop and Arbib 2002; Calinon and Billard 2007b; Nicolescu and Mataric 2003].”
From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics (2005, background): “object. Oztop and Arbib (2002) showed that an artificial neural network corresponding to PF and F5 mirror could be”
From motor to sensory processing in mirror neuron computational modelling (2010, methodology): “Likewise, in Haruno et al. (2001), Keysers and Perrett (2004), Ito and Tani (2004), Oztop et al. (2005), and Oztop and Arbib (2002), one presupposes that a view-independent description of the environment is computed and fed into mirror neuron mechanisms.”
The Hierarchical Organisation of Cortical and Basal-Ganglia Systems: A Computationally-Informed Review and Integrated Hypothesis (2013, positive): “…focussed on the cortical hierarchy develops models giving detailed accounts of the dorsal/ventral cortical pathways (e.g., Fagg and Arbib, 1998; Oztop and Arbib, 2002; see also the example in Section 3) but generally neglects the motivational processes at the origin of the overall guidance of…”
EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. (2005, background): “These results suggest that the frontal mirror neuron system may be one part of a broader action observation/execution network [18,38].”
An overview of 3D object grasp synthesis algorithms (2012, background): “Oztop and Arbib [53] propose a grasping strategy based on mirror neurons.”
A Developmental Roadmap for Learning by Imitation in Robots (2007, background): “The work presented in [6] relies on markers to get visual features for hand detection and grasping, in the context of imitation and modeling of the Mirror neurons.”
Neural and Computational Mechanisms of Action Processing: Interaction between Visual and Motor Representations. (2015, positive): “Among the ﬁrst and most inﬂuential work using artiﬁcial neural networks are the seminal models by Arbib and coworkers (Bo-naiuto et al., 2007; Oztop and Arbib, 2002).”
A connectionist architecture for view-independent grip-aperture computation. (2008, methodology): “According to various computational models ( [ Keysers and Perrett , 2004 ] , [ Oztop and Arbib , 2002 ] , [ Oztop et al .”
TRoPICALS: a computational embodied neuroscience model of compatibility effects. (2010, methodology): “…“stylised” grasping actions), and the model architecture needs to be further developed to tackle more complex tasks (e.g., involving realistic grasping actions and more than 2-DOFs for reaching; specific mechanisms for doing this might be drawn from Caligiore et al., 2008, and Oztop & Arbib, 2002).”