A semantic differential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception

By Shang Hwa Hsu, Chuang C. Ming, Chien-Cheng Chang. 2000

426 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ebedfd73c9a346ca2c61ecd86ff7b83d6f62b860

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. J. Blijlevens
2. Lin-lin Chen
3. W. Hung

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Jan Schoormans

In Social Psychology

1. Jan Schoormans
2. J. Blijlevens
3. Lin-lin Chen
4. W. Hung

Citations in the corpus

• Fundamental dimensions of affective responses to product shapes (2006, background): “For example, factor 1 extracted in many of these studies using factor analysis included adjectives such as avant-garde, modern, futuristic, stylish, contemporary, fashionable, antique-looking, retro-looking and traditional [2,3,5,6].”
• Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward rooftop photovoltaic installation: The roles of personal trait, psychological benefit, and government incentives (2020, background): “PV system marketers can identify and manage the strengths and weaknesses of innovation attributes and ensure that the marketing strategy incorporates making innovation attractive to the most receptive audience.(61) Faiers and Neame(25) suggested that suppliers and manufacturers of domestic solar pow”
• How consumers perceive product appearance: The identification of three product appearance attributes (2009, background): “This can be the result of the fact that designers are able to see more differences in products than consumers (Hsu et al., 2000).”