Optimizing agri-environment schemes for biodiversity, ecosystem services or both?
By Johan Ekroos, Ola Olsson, M. Rundlöf, Frank Wätzold, Henrik G. Smith. 2014
194 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d65c92e91c305c0f241c1942af3bbed3ac87779
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- P. Batáry
- D. Kleijn
- John M. Holland
- L. Dicks
- W. J. Sutherland
- S. Potts
- F. Sánchez‐Bayo
- Kris A. G. Wyckhuys
Citations in the corpus
- Protecting an ecosystem service: approaches to understanding and mitigating threats to wild insect pollinators (2016, background): “…services that generate yield benefits in agriculture, such as insect pollination, 508 although this objective should be clearly separated from their use to conserve biodiversity, 509 because the necessary actions are likely to be different (Ekroos et al., 2014, Kleijn et al., 510 2015).”
- The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management (2015, methodology): “We addressed 2 specific issues by merging the data sets of 3 recent meta-analyses on the effects of AES on species richness (Batáry et al. 2011; Scheper et al. 2013; Tuck et al. 2014).”
- Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers (2019, background): “For example, flower and grassland strips established at the field edge enhance the abundance of wild pollinators (Blaauw and Isaacs, 2014; Hopwood, 2008), and rotation of crops with clover boosts the abundance and diversity of bumblebees (Ekroos et al., 2014; Haaland and Bersier, 2011), which in tur”