Fighting rules and rival recognition reduce costs of aggression in male lizards, Podarcis hispanica
By P. López, José Martín. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2001
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb59f1535d8742db2d805e71466ccfd8c83f020f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Beyond 'nasty neighbours' and 'dear enemies'? Individual recognition by scent marks in a lizard (Podarcis hispanica) (2008, background): “…their territories against the repeated intrusions of rival males, whereby both the energetic costs of territory defence and the risks of suffering injuries can be minimized by reducing aggression towards familiar neighbours (e.g. Stamps & Krishnan 1998; Whiting 1999; López & Martı́n 2001, 2002).”
- Head shape allometry and proximate causes of head sexual dimorphism in Podarcis lizards: joining linear and geometric morphometrics (2007, background): “© 2008 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2008, 93, 111–124 not involving fighting, such as sneaking (Diaz, 1993; Lopez & Martin, 2001 ) or display behaviour (Molina-Borja, 1981, 1987), should be more frequently used in such circumstances.”
- Status-signalling chemical badges in male Iberian rock lizards (2007, methodology): “As for the closely related L. m. cyreni (= Iberolacerta cyreni ) (Martín & López 2000; Aragón, López & Martín 2004), male L. m. monticola aggressively defends its territories during the mating season, but as there is high home range overlap between neighbouring males, dominance hierarchies are often”
- Adult male collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris, increase aggression towards displaced neighbours (2003, background): “Differential response to neighbours and strangers in previous studies using neutral arena encounters with lizards (Glinski & Krekorian 1985; Olsson 1994; López & Martín 2001) suggest individual recognition, but say little imal Behaviour.”
- Chemosensory assessment of rival competitive ability and scent-mark function in a lizard, Podarcis hispanica (2007, background): “…results strongly suggest that male P. hispanica lizards are able to obtain information on the size of a rival male, an honest measure of dominance status and/or fighting ability in P. hispanica (López & Martı́n 2001), on the basis of intrinsic properties of scent marks deposited on the substrate.”
- Chemical rival recognition decreases aggression levels in male Iberian wall lizards, Podarcis hispanica (2002, background): “With this display, the responding male made the intruding male retreat or run away either without contact, by touching him on the flanks or, occasionally, by giving quick bites, especially on the snout or head ( Lopez and Martin 2001a; Lopez et al. 2001).”
- Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes (2005, background): “…fighting costs in social situations where the probability of encountering the same opponent on a regular basis is high (Zayan, 1975; Temeles, 1994; Morris, Gass & Ryan, 1995; Johnsson, 1997; Pagel & Dawkins, 1997; O’Connor, Metcalfe & Taylor, 2000; UtnePalm & Hart, 2000; Lopez & Martin, 2001).”
- The assessment game in sand fiddler crab contests for breeding burrows (2003, background): “…of assessment models have tested the predictions of sequential assessment (e.g. Enquist & Jakobsson 1986; Englund & Olsson 1990; Enquist et al. 1990; Jennions & Backwell 1996; Jensen & Yngvesson 1998; Molina-Borja et al. 1998; Bridge et al. 2000; Hofmann & Schildberger 2001; López & Martín 2001).”
- Fighting behavior in hermit crabs: the combined effect of resource-holding potential and resource value in Pagurus longicarpus (2006, unknown): “Repeated exposure to an opponent most often reduces fight intensity, e.g. in American lobsters (Karavanich and Atema 1998) and lizards (López and Martín 2001), and usually leads to high-ranking individuals monopolizing a disproportionate share of the available resources (Wittenberger 1981).”