Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes
By Y. Hsu, R. Earley, L. L. Wolf. Biological Reviews of The Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2005
706 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c43c9a0824d3a4f14d909212d56bef3fecfe4003
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding how animals fight with Lloyd Morgan's canon (2012, background): “There might be an immediate higher degree of aggression to the loser than to the winner, which indicates that information has been gathered (Hsu et al. 2006).”
- Exposing the behavioral gambit: the evolution of learning and decision rules (2013, background): “There has been some work on learning in an aggressive context, mainly in terms of winner and loser effects (Hsu et al. 2006).”
- Assessing dominance hierarchies: validation and advantages of progressive evaluation with Elo-rating (2011, background): “Choosing k Previous experience of individuals plays an important role in the outcome of agonistic encounters in many animal taxa: the winner of a previous interaction is more likely to win a future interaction, whereas losers are more likely to lose future interactions (Hsu et al. 2006).”
- Rules of engagement for resource contests in a social fish (2011, background): “The fish’s extensive daily interactions with its social group between contests probably minimized any winner or loser effects from the previous contest (Hsu et al. 2006).”
- How and why the winner effect forms: influences of contest environment and species differences (2010, methodology): “In California mice, winning experience accrued in an unfamiliar physical location tempers the formation of a full and robust winner effect (i.e., enhanced ability to win aggressive contests following past victories, reviewed by Hsu et al. 2006).”