China׳s carbon-emissions trading: Overview, challenges and future
By Liwei Liu, Chuxiang Chen, Yufei Zhao, E. Zhao. 2015
531 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb4c730420e1669bdc82a97fae0a2d3354f7a06e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Environmental Engineering
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- Forecasting carbon prices in the Shenzhen market, China: The role of mixed-frequency factors (2019, background): “In 2013 and 2014, seven national carbon markets were launched in five cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Chongqing and Shenzhen) and two provinces (Guangdong and Hubei) as part of China's commitment to the Kyoto Protocol [3].”
- Dynamics of China’s carbon prices in the pilot trading phase (2017, background): “Liu et al. (2015) explore the policy process and barriers to the development of ETS, while Zhao et al. (2016) comment on the market efficiency of ETS pilots based on a naïve assessment of price, trading volume, and information transparency.”
- Emission trading and carbon market performance in Shenzhen, China (2017, background): “The use of market-based instruments for controlling GHG emissions is a rather novel attempt in China, which is far from a mature market economy [4, 6, 7, 9, 19-21].”
- The allowance mechanism of China’s carbon trading pilots: A comparative analysis with schemes in EU and California (2017, background): “[16] conducted a general 53 assessment of China's seven carbon trading pilots, while several other researchers examined specific 54 pilots including their institutional structures and design features, such as Jiang et al.”
- Implementation of a multi-agent environmental regulation strategy under Chinese fiscal decentralization: An evolutionary game theoretical approach (2019, result): “Second, this study deviates from mainstream EGT research focused primarily on two-player games of identical or different subjects (Dal B o and Fr echette, 2011; Liu, 2015).”