The allowance mechanism of China’s carbon trading pilots: A comparative analysis with schemes in EU and California

By Ling Xiong, Bo Shen, Shaozhou Qi, L. Price, Bin Ye. 2017

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3050ce4aec1135c0463777cba324a5111c72ec4b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Easwaran J. Narassimhan
2. J. H. Fan
3. N. Todorova
4. K. Gallagher

In Environmental Engineering

1. J. H. Fan
2. N. Todorova

Citations in the corpus

• Dynamics of China’s carbon prices in the pilot trading phase (2017, methodology): “Xiong et al. (2017) conduct a comparative analysis of the designs of China’s ETS with the EU-ETS and the California ETS in which they highlight distinctive features in allowance mechanisms that affect the efficiency of China’s pilot markets.”
• Carbon pricing in practice: a review of existing emissions trading systems (2018, background): “…to enrolment and rolling baseline years that allow firms to be benchmarked on their latest emissions data if their emissions increased significantly from the original benchmark (European Commission, 2011; Pang & Duan, 2016; PMR & ICAP, 2016; Xiong et al., 2017; Ye, Jiang, Miao, Li, & Peng, 2016).”