Defining the ‘positive’ in positive psychology: Part I. A descriptive analysis

By James O. Pawelski. 2016

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb202f9b0b4e439faec607831867a97af6f21ffc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Margaret L. Kern
2. James O. Pawelski
3. Paige L. Williams
4. L. Oades
5. Melissa G. Keith
6. Louis Tay
7. L. Waters
8. T. Lomas

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. L. Oades
2. Melissa G. Keith
3. Margaret L. Kern
4. Louis Tay
5. L. Waters
6. T. Lomas
7. James O. Pawelski
8. Sarah Mercer

In Social Psychology

1. L. Waters
2. Margaret L. Kern
3. James O. Pawelski
4. Paige L. Williams
5. L. Oades
6. Melissa G. Keith
7. Louis Tay
8. T. Lomas

Citations in the corpus

• Third wave positive psychology: broadening towards complexity (2020, background): “In that respect, Pawelski (2016a, 2016b) delineated one inclusion criterion and five continuum criteria for identifying something as positive.”
• The role of the arts and humanities in human flourishing: A conceptual model (2018, background): “Components of flourishing Studies indicative of flourishing effects Future research questions based on past studies Positive neurological, physio- logical, and affective changes neural activity corresponding to the Default Mode network, which has been linked to autobiographical memory, theory of min”