Argumentation mining

By Raquel Mochales Palau, Marie-Francine Moens. 2011

419 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Natural Language Processing

Citations in the corpus

Probing Neural Network Comprehension of Natural Language Arguments (2019, background): “Argumentation mining is the task of determining argumentative structure in natural language text - e.g., which text segments represent claims, and which comprise reasons that support or attack those claims (Mochales and Moens, 2011; Lippi and Torroni, 2016).”
Annotating Argument Components and Relations in Persuasive Essays (2014, background): “separating argumentative from non-argumentative sentences (Mochales-Palau and Moens, 2011), identifying argument components (Rooney et al.”
Argumentation Mining on the Web from Information Seeking Perspective (2014, background): “• Inter-annotation agreement (IAA) that reflects reliability of the annotated data is either not reported (Feng and Hirst, 2011; Mochales and Moens, 2011; Walton, 2012; Florou et al., 2013; Villalba and Saint-Dizier, 2012), or is not based on a chance-corrected measure (Llewellyn et al.”
From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey (2013, background): “One example is given by (Palau and Moens, 2011), who work with legal texts and aim at tracing the argumentation put forward by the parties involved, which may significantly enrich the retrieval capabilities of legal databases.”
Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essays (2016, methodology): “…other text genres might not include major claims, previous work has already demonstrated that claims and premises can also be reliably annotated in legal cases (Mochales-Palau and Moens 2011), written dialogs (Biran and Rambow 2011) and even over multiple wikipedia articles (Aharoni et al. 2014).”
Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussions (2016, background): “Argumentation mining focuses on fine-grained analysis of arguments and on discovering the relationships, such as support and premise, between different arguments [34].”