From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey

By Andreas Peldszus, Manfred Stede. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, 2013

388 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fdd98a004d1205fec9888b5c84675a0da7429f2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

Citations in the corpus

Let’s Make Your Request More Persuasive: Modeling Persuasive Strategies via Semi-Supervised Neural Nets on Crowdfunding Platforms (2019, background): “Computational argumentation has received much recent attention (Ghosh et al., 2016; Stab and Gurevych, 2017; Peldszus and Stede, 2013; Stab et al., 2018; Ghosh et al., 2014).”
TIARA: A Tool for Annotating Discourse Relations and Sentence Reordering (2020, background): “Only then can the writing ultimately communicate the desired ideas as a whole (Toulmin, 2003; Jacobs et al., 1981; Reed and Wells, 2007; Peldszus and Stede, 2013; Matsumura and Sakamoto, 2019).”
Annotating Argument Components and Relations in Persuasive Essays (2014, methodology): “We follow the approach proposed by Peldszus and Stede (2013) and deﬁne two directed relations between argument components: support and attack .”
Argument Mining: A Survey (2020, background): “Previous reviews, including Palau and Moens (2009) and Peldszus and Stede (2013a), predated this explosion in the volume of work in the area, whereas more contemporary reviews are aimed at different audiences: Budzynska and Villata (2017) at the computational argumentation community and Lippi and…”
Argumentation Mining on the Web from Information Seeking Perspective (2014, background): “studies from general discourse analysis (Newman and Marshall, 1991; Walton, 2012) and road-maps or position papers (Schneider and Wyner, 2012; Peldszus and Stede, 2013a; Sergeant, 2013).”
Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse (2016, methodology): “A study on annotation of arguments was conducted by Peldszus and Stede (2013b), who evaluate agreement among 26 “naive” annotators (annotators with very little training).”
Argumentative Relation Classification as Plausibility Ranking (2019, background): “n another. By now, there exists a substantial body of research publications covering a variety of argument analysis topics. For a general overview, we refer the reader to Lippi and Torroni (2016) and Peldszus and Stede (2013). Plausibility ranking Another task that can be addressed as a text plausib”
Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays (2014, background): “For instance, the argumentation scheme proposed by Peldszus and Stede (2013) includes three argumentative relations (support, attack and counter-attack), whereas Stab and Gurevych (2014) propose a scheme including only two relations (support and attack).”