The pupillary system.

By J. Beatty, B. Lucero-Wagoner. 2000

920 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eac1706b8d3fa56b539f3ff6fe85fa495ead71e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Review on Psychological Stress Detection Using Biosignals (2019, background): “It is considered that it reflects the activity of the sympathetic and vagal components of the ANS.”
Pupillometry (2012, background): “Changes that are cognitively driven are more modest and are rarely greater than 0.5 mm (Beatty & Lucero-Wagoner, 2000).”
Biometric Measures for Interactive Advertising Research (2011, background): “…is questionable, because many factors can influence pupil dilation that have nothing to do with the emotional engagement, such as changes in illumination (Beatty and Lucero-Wagoner 2000), cognitive workload (Kahneman and Tversky 1973; Kramer 1991), and participants' gaze angle (Kleinke 1986).”
Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data (2018, background): “Psychologists are often interested in how pupil size is affected by some experimental manipulation (reviewed in Beatty & Lucero-Wagoner, 2000; Mathôt & Van der Stigchel, 2015).”
Review of eye-related measures of drivers’ mental workload (2015, background): “It is therefore of no surprise that many researchers use or study eye-related parameters to assess drivers’ mental workload [2-6].”
Eye tracking studies of normative and atypical development (2007, background): “Another measure is latency to peak dilation, an index of processing speed (Beatty & Lucero-Wagoner, 2000).”
Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? (2016, background): “By inhibiting the Edinger-Westphal nucleus and the pupil’s constricting muscle, LC activity therefore indirectly dilates the pupil (Beatty and Lucero-Wagoner, 2000; Loewenfeld and Lowenstein, 1993; Samuels and Szabadi, 2008).”
Psycho-physiological measures for assessing cognitive load (2010, background): “This approach is based on evidence that varying task difficulty influences psycho-physiological signals such as pupillary responses, eye movements and blink interval [3, 21, 22, 52], heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) [10, 29, 52], electroencephalogram (EEG or brainwave levels) [23, 52”
Review of Eye Tracking Metrics Involved in Emotional and Cognitive Processes (2021, background): “The size of the pupil is controlled by two sets of muscles, the constrictor and dilator pupillae, which are governed by the sympathetic (SNS) and parasympathetic (PNS) divisions of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) [29].”
Don't fear ‘fear conditioning’: Methodological considerations for the design and analysis of studies on human fear acquisition, extinction, and return of fear (2017, unknown): “…correction across multiple day paradigms • No clear guidelines available • Systematic review of the background and empirical literature in humans as well as some recommendations (Beatty and Lucero-Wagoner, 2000) EEG/MEG • Modulation by stimuli onset and during conditions • Dependent…”