Improved Techniques for Grid Mapping With Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filters
By Giorgio Grisetti, Cyrill Stachniss, Wolfram Burgard. IEEE Transactions on robotics, 2007
2,555 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eac11872f8a29a18058bf61dd04929e1ac29d258
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Daniel Cremers
- Wolfram Burgard
- Michael Kaess
- Mathieu Labbé
- François Michaud
- Davide Scaramuzza
- Giorgio Grisetti
- Vladlen Koltun
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Wolfram Burgard
- Nicholas A. Roy
- Percy Liang
- Dieter Fox
- Mohit Bansal
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Michael Kaess
- Wolfram Burgard
- Frank Dellaert
- Abraham Bachrach
- Giorgio Grisetti
- François Michaud
- Mathieu Labbé
- Nicholas A. Roy
Citations in the corpus
- Deep reinforcement learning based mobile robot navigation: A review (2021, methodology): “The laser SLAM algorithm directly constructs an obstacle map of the environment based on the dense laser ranging results of algorithms such as GMapping[4] and Hector SLAM[5].”
- Autonomous flight in unstructured and unknown indoor environments (2009, methodology): “The motion model for the particles in the GMapping algorithm was based on a standard motion model for ground robots with wheel odometry.”
- On behalf of: Multimedia Archives (2012, positive): “First of all, an improved version of Olson's SGD (Olson et al., 2006) as implemented in the popular TORO library (Grisetti et al., 2007c) is used.”
- Evaluating Egomotion and Structure-from-Motion Approaches Using the TUM RGB-D Benchmark (2012, background): “Different sensor modalities have been explored in the past, including 2D laser scanners [25], [26], 3D scanners [27]– [29], monocular cameras [17], [22]–[24], [30]–[32], stereo”
- A benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D SLAM systems (2012, background): “Different sensor modalities have been explored in the past, including 2D laser scanners [17], [18], 3D scanners [19]– [21], monocular cameras [9], [14]–[16], [22]–[24], stereo systems [25], [26] and recently RGB-D sensors such as the Microsoft Kinect [2]–[4].”
- Semantic mapping for mobile robotics tasks: A survey (2015, background): “The representative works described in [14], [17], [18] and [19] prove the necessity for an accurate representation of the robot's surroundings as well as the development of efficient mapping methods.”
- RTAB‐Map as an open‐source lidar and visual simultaneous localization and mapping library for large‐scale and long‐term online operation (2018, methodology): “Let us start with the following lidar approaches: (cid:129) GMapping (Grisetti, Stachniss, & Burgard, 2007) and TinySLAM (Steux & El Hamzaoui, 2010) are two approaches that use a particle filer to estimate the robot trajectory.”
- A Random-Finite-Set Approach to Bayesian SLAM (2011, methodology): “As such, grid-map-estimation errors can be readily defined via Euclidean, mean squared, or sum of squared error metrics [15].”
- Active localization with dynamic obstacles (2016, methodology): “Before the experiments, the TurtleBot 2 with the laser range finder was manually driven (with no dynamic obstacles present) to produce an accurate map of the environment using the ROS gmapping package [17].”
- Multiple‐Robot Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: A Review (2016, methodology): “0 for dense scanning laser, such as improved grid mapping (Grisetti et al., 2007), FastSLAM1.”
- iSAM: Incremental Smoothing and Mapping (2008, methodology): “We evaluate pose-only iSAM on simulated as well as real-world datasets, assuming known data association, as the generation of pose constraints by scan-matching has been well studied and good algorithms are available [22], [23].”
- Sub-meter indoor localization in unmodified environments with inexpensive sensors (2010, methodology): “D map of the environment and correct the odometry of the robot, a horizontal LIDAR is used with the GMapping SLAM system, an efficient open-source implementation of gridbased FastSLAM [25].”
- Towards a benchmark for RGB-D SLAM evaluation (2011, background): “Different sensor modalities have been explored in the past, including 2D laser scanners [12], [3], 3D scanners [14], [16], monocular cameras [13], [7], [9], [19], [20] and stereo systems [8].”
- High-accuracy 3D sensing for mobile manipulation: Improving object detection and door opening (2009, methodology): “For the intensity and gradient channels we normalize by subtracting the average (mean) from within the window; for the depth channel we normalize by subtracting the median depth.”
- Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: First prototype and lessons learned (2016, background): “[22] for mapping, since it is able to cope with uncertain odometry data and short-range depth data.”
- Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles (2017, methodology): “A variation of the Particle Filter, Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filters(RBPF), has also been introduced as a solution to the SLAM problem in [150,151].”
- Toward understanding natural language directions (2010, methodology): “The laser scans and odometry were used by a SLAM module in order to create a map as the robot explores the environment [14], while the camera was used to detect baseline objects in order to create a semantic map.”