Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration.
By K. Spokas, K. Cantrell, J. Novak, D. Archer, J. Ippolito, H. Collins, A. Boateng, I. Lima, M. Lamb, A. Mcaloon and 2 more. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2012
947 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6352a3abd044a2bd888847efc267c1ba2ed45411
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Soil Science
Citations in the corpus
- Heterogeneous global crop yield response to biochar: a meta-regression analysis (2013, background): “Numerous controlled field and greenhouse experiments have investigated yield response to biochar, and results have been summarized in several reviews [3, 11–14].”
- Cost‐benefit analysis of using biochar to improve cereals agriculture (2015, background): “data could not reliably support these scenarios (Spokas et al., 2011).”
- Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. (2013, background): “potential to improve the productivity of soils (while still offering at least some of the other benefits) [7,8].”
- Comparison of biochar properties from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500°C. (2013, background): “As a result, higher pyrolysis temperatures significantly increased the pH of biochar (Spokas et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2013).”
- Innovation as a driver of eco‐innovation in the firm: An approach from the dynamic capabilities theory (2020, neutral): “For example, Spokas et al. (2012) The interrelation between innovation and eco-innovation Doran (2012) points out that the interrelation between capabilities arises as a consequence of the need to develop tasks and the affinity between them.”