Cost‐benefit analysis of using biochar to improve cereals agriculture
By D. Dickinson, Ludovico Balduccio, J. Buysse, F. Ronsse, G. Van Huylenbroeck, W. Prins. 2015
130 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Biomaterials, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9de5e62abe0db1cac765aa0c2bf14ace4f592796
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Agronomy and Crop Science
In Soil Science
Citations in the corpus
- Enhancement of maize plant growth with inoculation of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and biochar amendment in soil (2017, background): “Biochar production and its application as soil amendment achieved promising results for crop production (Dickinson et al. 2015; Ortas 2016; Changxun et al. 2016), soil quality improvement (Fang et al. 2016), biochemical property enhancement to facilitate soil biota (Puga et al. 2015; Hairani et al.…”
- Adsorptive removal of antibiotics from water and wastewater: Progress and challenges. (2015, background): “…BC production has been calculated and summarized as being in a range of $0.2-0.5/kg based on the frequently reported data, and focusing on the woody waste BC rather than hardwood as environmentally and socially it is more sustainable to utilize woody wastes than hardwood (Dickinson et al., 2014).”
- Insight into biochar properties and its cost analysis (2016, background): “There is currently no major industrial BC market from which to obtain BC price and cost data for a comprehensive estimation [29].”
- Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects (2018, background): “Currently, high biochar prices prevents its large-scale application (Vochozka et al 2016, Dickinson et al 2015).”
- Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling (2018, background): “Estimating and reducing the costs of biochar are put forth as a key way to spur demand for it (Spokas et al 2012, Dickinson et al 2015), in particular, the costs of pyrolysis (Meyer et al 2011).”
- Financial viability of biofuel and biochar production from forest biomass in the face of market price volatility and uncertainty (2018, background): “[38] simulated the scenario of higher value crops by doubling cereals prices and found positive NPV after 25 years in northwest Europe and 5 years in Sub-Saharan Africa.”
- Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies (2016, background): “There may be economic benefits from biochar application that offset some of these costs (Dickinson et al., 2014), but the benefits differ by region.”