Environmental DNA

By P. Taberlet, É. Coissac, Mehrdad Hajibabaei, Loren H. Rieseberg. Molecular Ecology, 2012

1,392 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eaae7b18c38c703285a7be7d2319b71a366706bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Freshwater biomonitoring in the Information Age (2017, methodology): “Environmental DNA was defined by Taberlet et al. (2012) as the “DNA that can be extracted from environmental samples (such as soil, water, or air), without first isolating any target organisms”.”
Protecting an ecosystem service: approaches to understanding and mitigating threats to wild insect pollinators (2016, methodology): “…such molecular identification is not limited by the state of the specimen, for 675 instance an insect pollinator specimen can be identified at any developmental life-stage or 676 even from non-living remains in the environment (eDNA) (Taberlet et al., 2012), or ingested 677 by predators.”
Validation and Development of COI Metabarcoding Primers for Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment (2017, positive): “This technique, coined “DNA metabarcoding,” has already been widely used to generate comprehensive taxa lists for many ecosystems and environments (Taberlet et al., 2012).”
Metabarcoding reveals strong spatial structure and temporal turnover of zooplankton communities among marine and freshwater ports (2016, background): “When coupled with high-throughput sequencing, barcoding of bulk samples – metabarcoding – enables rapid screening of taxonomically complex communities (Taberlet et al., 2012; Yu et al., 2012) with the sensitivity to detect rare organisms such as endangered species and early invaders.”
Next‐generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding (2016, methodology): “Because DNA is susceptible to degradation in the environment, metabarcodes of <100 bp were targeted (Taberlet et al. 2012).”
Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity (2015, background): “…products and many still do, there is no doubt that the new emerging sequencing technologies will have profound impact on eDNA studies (Shokralla et al., 2012), and become a fully integrated part of ecologists’ toolbox (Baird and Hajibabaei, 2012; Taberlet et al., 2012b; Valentini et al., 2009b).”
Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding and underwater visual census to monitor tropical reef fishes (2020, positive): “…-ACACCGCCCGTCACTCTC, reverse: -CATGTTACGACTTGCCTCCTC), teleosteans (teleo/Tele01, forward: -ACACCGCCCGTCACTCT, reverse: -CTTCCGGTACACTTACCATG) and more generally vertebrates (Vert01, forward: -TAGAACAGGCTC CTCTAG, reverse: -TTAGATACCCCACTATGC) (Taberlet et al., 2018; Valentini et al., 2016).”
Lake sediment multi-taxon DNA from North Greenland records early post-glacial appearance of vascular plants and accurately tracks environmental changes (2015, positive): “This approach, termed DNA metabarcoding (Taberlet et al., 2012), has enabled the parallel retrieval of large amounts of informative data (e.g. Binladen et al., 2007; Valentini et al., 2009; Willerslev et al., 2014).”
Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass—Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol (2015, background): “When complete specimens are identified in bulk, it was suggested to use the term DNA metabarcoding to make a distinction to approaches using environmental DNA (eDNA) [27].”
obitools: a unix‐inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding (2016, methodology): “DNA metabarcoding is an emerging approach for biodiversity studies (Taberlet et al. 2012).”
Detection of a Diverse Marine Fish Fauna Using Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples (2012, neutral): “the extraction and analysis of genetic material obtained directly from environmental samples [13].”
From environmental DNA sequences to ecological conclusions: How strong is the influence of methodological choices? (2019, methodology): “However, MOTUs frequency correlates to a certain extent to species relative abundance, and more importantly, errors are usually rarer than genuine sequences (reviewed in Taberlet et al., 2018).”
Species-specific detection and quantification of environmental DNA from marine fishes in the Baltic Sea (2019, positive): “Environmental DNA (eDNA) provides such an alternative tool for determining the presence of species in aquatic environments (Taberlet et al., 2012; Evans et al., 2016), and could potentially assist marine fisheries surveys with estimation of fish stock biomasses of commercially important species…”