Metabarcoding reveals strong spatial structure and temporal turnover of zooplankton communities among marine and freshwater ports

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Towards the Optimization of eDNA/eRNA Sampling Technologies for Marine Biosecurity Surveillance (2021, background): “, [23,24]), detect and monitor rare species in complex environments (e.”
Benchmarking DNA Metabarcoding for Biodiversity-Based Monitoring and Assessment (2016, background): “…of aquatic environments (Porazinska et al., 2009; Chariton et al., 2010; Fonseca et al., 2014; Dell’Anno et al., 2015; Leray and Knowlton, 2015; Chain et al., 2016), and an increasing number of studies have directly applied the approach for environmental biomonitoring purposes (Ji et al.,…”
Early detection of aquatic invaders using metabarcoding reveals a high number of non‐indigenous species in Canadian ports (2016, background): “These sequences were not verified or quality checked, but previous analyses revealed that most of the common zooplankton groups reported within Canada are detectable using the local database (Chain et al., 2016).”