Determining Power and Sample Size for Simple and Complex Mediation Models

1,593 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Why are conservatives less concerned about the coronavirus (COVID-19) than liberals? Comparing political, experiential, and partisan messaging explanations (2020, methodology): “We used modern bootstrapping techniques to estimate power for mediation tests (Schoemann et al., 2017).”
Parasocial interactions with real and virtual influencers: The role of perceived similarity and human-likeness (2022, methodology): “Based on our planned statistical analyses, we used the Monte Carlo Power Analysis for Indirect Effects method provided by Schoemann et al. (2017) to calculate the minimum sample size for the current study.”
Sample Size Justification (2021, positive): “, 2018), and an increasing number of applied tutorials for specific tests (Brysbaert & Stevens, 2018; DeBruine & Barr, 2019; P. Green & MacLeod, 2016; Kruschke, 2013; Lakens & Caldwell, 2021; Schoemann et al., 2017; Westfall et al., 2014).”
Self-concept clarity mediates the effects of adverse childhood experiences on adult suicide behavior, depression, loneliness, perceived stress, and life distress (2018, methodology): “Power estimates for the sample size were determined for one mediator and two parallel mediator models using the R application by Schoemann, Boulton, and Short (2017).”