Spectroscopic Identification of a Protocluster at z = 2.300: Environmental Dependence of Galaxy Properties at High Redshift

By C. Steidel, K. Adelberger, A. Shapley, D. Erb, Naveen A. Reddy, M. Pettini. 2005

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We have discovered a highly significant overdensity of galaxies at z = 2.300 ± 0.015 in the course of a redshift survey designed to select star-forming galaxies in the redshift range z = 2.3 ± 0.4 in the field of the bright z = 2.72 QSO HS 1700+643. The structure has a redshift-space galaxy overdensity of δ ≃ 7 and an estimated matter overdensity in real space of δm ≃ 1.8, indicating that it will virialize by z ~ 0 with a mass scale of ≃1.4 × 1015 M☉, that of a rich galaxy cluster. Detailed modeling of the spectral energy distribution—from the rest-frame far-UV to the rest-frame near-IR—of the 72 spectroscopically confirmed galaxies in this field for which we have obtained Ks and Spitzer IRAC photometry allows for a first direct comparison of galaxy properties as a function of large-scale environment at high redshift. We find that galaxies in the protocluster environment have mean stellar masses and inferred ages that are ~2 times larger (at z = 2.30) than identically UV-selected galaxies outside of the structure, and we show that this is consistent with simple theoretical expectations for the acceleration of structure formation in a region that is overdense on large scales by the observed amount. The protocluster environment contains a significant number of galaxies that already appear old, with large stellar masses (>1011 M☉), by z = 2.3.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea3b34080cbaf609cf1a7577cb707b71a3110cd5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. M. Franx
  4. P. V. van Dokkum
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. C. Conroy
  7. Christopher J. Conselice
  8. A. Dekel

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Naveen A. Reddy
  2. C. Steidel
  3. A. Shapley
  4. M. Pettini
  5. R. Overzier
  6. D. Erb
  7. M. Franx
  8. S. Gillessen

In Instrumentation

  1. M. Franx
  2. P. V. van Dokkum
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. C. Steidel
  6. A. Shapley
  7. C. Conroy
  8. R. Dav'e

Citations in the corpus