Winners and losers of conservation policies for European eel, Anguilla anguilla: an economic welfare analysis for differently specialised eel anglers

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluating the Ability of Specialization Indicators to Explain Fishing Preferences (2013, methodology): “Many behaviors of specialized anglers reflect the psychological dependency on fishing (Dorow et al., 2010; Salz & Loomis, 2005).”
Diversity and complexity of angler behaviour drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model (2010, background): “For example , in many fisheries, a minority of anglers catches the majority of fish (Baccante 1995), and this minority typically encompasses the most avid and specialized angler types (Dorow et al. 2010).”
Rethinking length-based fisheries regulations: the value of protecting old and large fish with harvest slots (2015, background): “Although variation among cultures and fisheries exist (Bryan 1977; Fisher 1997; Dorow et al. 2010), non-harvest attributes of the catch-related fishing experience, such as catch rate (Anderson 1993; Cox et al. 2003) and size of the fish captured (Powers et al. 1975; Jacobson 1996; Arlinghaus 2006),…”
Recreational angler satisfaction: What drives it? (2021, background): “Catch is a fundamental component of fishing and it encompasses multiple dimensions such as catch rate, catch size, trophy catch and harvest, which differ in importance by angler type and fishery (Anderson et al., 2007; Beardmore et al., 2015; Dabrowksa et al., 2017; Dorow et al., 2010).”