Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated?

By Erik Frøkjær, M. Hertzum, Kasper Hornbæk. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2000

765 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Usability comprises the aspects effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. The correlations between these aspects are not well understood for complex tasks. We present data from an experiment where 87 subjects solved 20 information retrieval tasks concerning programming problems. The correlation between efficiency, as indicated by task completion time, and effectiveness, as indicated by quality of solution, was negligible. Generally, the correlations among the usability aspects depend in a complex way on the application domain, the user's experience, and the use context. Going through three years of CHI Proceedings, we find that 11 out of 19 experimental studies involving complex tasks account for only one or two aspects of usability. When these studies make claims concerning overall usability, they rely on risky assumptions about correlations between usability aspects. Unless domain specific studies suggest otherwise, effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction should be considered independent aspect of usability and all be included in usability testing.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9f6a7cbdcdfa274c2c59b8a7c82717344f80e39

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

  1. Vivian Lai
  2. Hock Hai Teo
  3. Q. Liao
  4. Lih-Bin Oh
  5. Kasper Hornbæk
  6. Kwok Kee Wei
  7. Chunhui Liu
  8. Jeff Sauro

In Social Psychology

  1. Vivian Lai
  2. Q. Liao
  3. Kasper Hornbæk
  4. Kwok Kee Wei
  5. Jeff Sauro
  6. Chenhao Tan

In Human-Computer Interaction

  1. Keith S. Karn
  2. Vivian Lai
  3. Hock Hai Teo
  4. Q. Liao
  5. Lih-Bin Oh
  6. Kasper Hornbæk
  7. Robert J. K. Jacob
  8. Kwok Kee Wei

Citations in the corpus