Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (Gem) - 2005 Report on High-Expectation Entrepreneurship

By Erkko Autio. 2005

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9cce0c41194cb1b139c4692458358012c8ea0f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. David B. Audretsch
2. Erkko Autio
3. Dirk De Clercq
4. Saul Estrin
5. N. Bosma
6. David Urbano
7. J. Levie
8. E. Stam

Citations in the corpus

• High-Tech Immigrant Entrepreneurship in the United States (2011, background): “An emerging body of evidence (summarized by Autio, 2005) suggests that a small fraction of young businesses have a disproportionate impact from the growth perspective; 1% to 10% of new firms, in these studies, generate 40% to 75% of new jobs.”
• Global entrepreneurship and institutions: an introduction (2014, background): “…qualitative differences among entrepreneurial entries was produced with the introduction of the first GEM report on ‘highaspiration’ entrepreneurship (Autio, 2005), which found (consistent with Birch, 1997) that the bulk of anticipated job creation through entrepreneurial entries was attributable…”
• Which Institutions Encourage Entrepreneurial Growth Aspirations (2013, background): “Thus, previous GEM-based research shows that individuals with higher educational attainment are more likely to direct their efforts towards high-growth activities (Autio, 2005) so we control for tertiary education (EducPost).”
• Picking the winner? Empirical evidence on the targeting of R&D subsidies to start-ups (2012, background): “: +49 3641 943200 Fax: +49 3641 943202 E-Mail: Uwe.Cantner@uni-jena.de”
• The relationship between innovation, knowledge, and performance in family and non-family firms: an analysis of SMEs (2013, background): “Similarly, many Western nations such as some European countries, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand have factored consistently in recent entrepreneurship studies as being conducive to entrepreneurship (Busenitz et al. 2000; Autio 2005).”
• Entrepreneurial Self–Efficacy: Refining the Measure (2009, background): “Future studies of ESE should seek to understand how the different dimensions of ESE relate to venture growth expectations (Autio, 2005).”
• A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model (2008, background): “More positive and significant bivariate associations have been found with measures of the relative prevalence of high-growth expectation entrepreneurial activity, that is, HEA as a proportion of TEA (Autio, 2005; Autio, 2007).”
• Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort (2008, methodology): “…either in the start-up phase or are managing/owning a business less than 42 months old, and who expect to employ at least 20 persons within 5 years (Autio, 2005).8 Like the TEA index, we checked the reliability of the TEAHG index by calculating its year-to-year correlation over the sample…”
• The global entrepreneurship index (GEINDEX) (2010, unknown): “Here, the HIGHEDUC variable serves to capture the quality of entrepreneurs; it is widely held that entrepreneurs with higher education degrees are more capable and willing to start and manage high-growth businesses (Autio 2005, Davidsson and Honig 2003).”
• High Growth Entrepreneurs, Public Policies and Economic Growth (2007, background): “Countries that are much more entrepreneurial, like the US and New-Zealand, have a share of potential fast growers of respectively 1.41% and 1.42% (Autio 2005).”