Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion

By A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, Alberto Nicolis, R. Rattazzi. 2006

1,075 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We argue that certain apparently consistent low-energy effective field theories described by local, Lorentzinvariant Lagrangians, secretly exhibit macroscopic non-locality and cannot be embedded in any UV theory whose S-matrix satisfies canonical analyticity constraints. The obstruction involves the signs of a set of leading irrelevant operators, which must be strictly positive to ensure UV analyticity. An IR manifestation of this restriction is that the “wrong” signs lead to superluminal fluctuations around non-trivial backgrounds, making it impossible to define local, causal evolution, and implying a surprising IR breakdown of the effective theory. Such effective theories can not arise in quantum field theories or weakly coupled string theories, whose S-matrices satisfy the usual analyticity properties. This conclusion applies to the DGP brane-world model modifying gravity in the IR, giving a simple explanation for the difficulty of embedding this model into controlled stringy backgrounds, and to models of electroweak symmetry breaking that predict negative anomalous quartic couplings for the W and Z. Conversely, any experimental support for the DGP model, or measured negative signs for anomalous quartic gauge boson couplings at future accelerators, would constitute direct evidence for the existence of superluminality and macroscopic non-locality unlike anything previously seen in physics, and almost incidentally falsify both local quantum field theory and perturbative string theory.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9b6ffe2b98db84e8207d5becd8ac78167e3dafb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Baumann
  2. L. Senatore
  3. F. Vernizzi
  4. Claudia de Rham
  5. Tsutomu Kobayashi
  6. Kurt Hinterbichler
  7. M. Zaldarriaga
  8. David Simmons-Duffin

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. David Simmons-Duffin
  2. D. Baumann
  3. David Poland
  4. S. Rychkov
  5. A. Fitzpatrick
  6. Jared Kaplan
  7. S. Caron-Huot
  8. R. Myers

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. R. Myers
  2. David Simmons-Duffin
  3. Thomas Hartman
  4. Eric Perlmutter
  5. S. Rychkov
  6. Jared Kaplan
  7. David Poland
  8. I. Sawicki

Citations in the corpus