Simulation of the Intraseasonal Oscillation in the ECHAM-4 Model: The Impact of Coupling with an Ocean Model*
By S. Kemball-Cook, Bin Wang, Xiouhua Fu. 2001
162 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9a205b20671adfef4bc9095389049def9a2bf31
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Global and Planetary Change
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- Simulations of the Madden–Julian oscillation in four pairs of coupled and uncoupled global models (2006, methodology): “Other possible factors include model resolutions (e.g., Hayashi and Golder 1986; Slingo et al. 1996, Gualdi et al. 1997; Inness et al. 2001; Duffy et al 2003), background state (e.g., Slingo et al. 1996; Hendon 2000; Inness et al 2003; Sperber et al 2005), and air–sea coupling (e.g., Waliser et al. ”
- Madden‐Julian Oscillation (2005, background): “…that energizing effects of the positive anomaly in SST ahead (east of) convective centers of the MJO, through an enhancement in either surface latent flux [Flatau et al., 1997] or low-level moisture convergence [Waliser et al., 1999b; Kemball-Cook et al., 2002], help improve MJO simulations.”
- MJO Simulation Diagnostics (2009, background): “…(Inness and Slingo 2003), uncertainty in the importance of ocean–atmospheric coupling (e.g., Gualdi et al. 1999a; Waliser et al. 1999b; Hendon 2000; Kemball-Cook et al. 2002; Inness et al. 2003; Zheng et al. 2004; Sperber et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2006), the importance of achieving a proper…”
- Atmosphere‐ocean coupled processes in the Madden‐Julian oscillation (2015, background): “Many studies have noted improved MJO simulation when an atmosphere-only GCM (AGCM) is coupled to an ocean model [e.g., Kemball-Cook et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2006; Pegion and Kirtman, 2008a; Kim et al., 2008], suggesting a role for ocean feedbacks in the MJO life cycle.”
- Application of MJO Simulation Diagnostics to Climate Models (2009, background): “…Earth Sciences and Technology Center, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, 21250, USA 11National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000 USA 12Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code: 0221, La Jolla CA, 92093 USA”
- ENSO regulation of MJO teleconnection (2011, background): “The mean background fields are important as they affect the organization, intensification, and propagation of the intraseasonal oscillation and teleconnection ( Kemball-Cook et al. 2002 ).”
- An Idealized Semi-Empirical Framework for Modeling the Madden–Julian Oscillation (2012, background): “…of GCM studies indicate that while ocean coupling may improve the simulation of the MJO, it is not essential to the existence of the MJO (Waliser et al. 1999; Hendon 2000; Kemball-Cook et al. 2002; Inness and Slingo 2003; Zheng et al. 2004; Maloney and Sobel 2004; Grabowski 2006; Fu et al. 2007).”
- Surface Fluxes and Tropical Intraseasonal Variability: a Reassessment (2008, background): “In GCM studies, ocean coupling enhances northward-propagating intraseasonal variability in the Indian Ocean to varying degrees (e.g. Zheng et al. 2004, Seo et al. 2007, Fu et al. 2007, Fu and Wang 2004, Kemball-Cook et al. 2002).”
- Impact of Atmosphere-Ocean Coupling on the Predictability of Monsoon Intraseasonal Oscillations (2007, background): “Many previous studies have shown that air-sea coupling can improve the simulations of tropical intraseasonal oscillations in one-way or the other (Flatau et al. 1997; Waliser et al. 1999b; Kemball-Cook et al. 2002; Fu et al., 2003; Inness and Slingo 2003; Marshall and Alves 2006, and among others).”